Ongezellig

>>82109
The foid that types this definitely got penetrated by her dog at least once

>>99171
ev&oe that would be coco

>>99176
Mayafail projection

>>82990
We're all a clump of cells on a spinning ball floating through space so nothing hecking matters but don't you ever say the n word!

>>82521
I heard that child sacrifice was common in ancient times because it gave people magic powers o algo

>>99180
now it gives women a magic power to evade responsibility

>>99173
I believe this unironically

>Your abortion is: You aborted a celebral palsy retard

>Your abortion is: You aborted a healthy child

>Your abortion is: You aborted a future genius

>>99188
>>99189
Please stop

>Your abortion is: You aborted a king

>>99188
>>99189
>>99190
>>99192
all gems

>Your abortion is: You aborted the child that would save the world

>Your abortion is: You aborted God

>your abortion is: >>99193

>>99198
Nigga go back to yt shorts

Mr dweller infiltrated this website it seems

Mr Dweller VVON

>>99043
it's interesting how you never see anti-abortion activists attempt to define the word "life", despite "life begins at conception" being their central argument.

>>105586
Life is defined biologically as something which meets these criteria:
> cellular order
>sensitivity or response to the environment
>reproduction
>growth and development
>regulation
>homeostasis
>energy processing
All of these are met by a fetus
>in b4 no reproduction
The cells of fetae reproduce, so they do meet this classification. Fetae are factually alive, but that’s a separate question from whether they have personhood, and thus rights.

>>105587
exactly, and if you asked them why we should have ethical consideration for matter which meets this criteria, they're probably respond with a circular explanation like "because it's life". anti-abortion commentators purposely exploit the connotation of the word "life" to their predominantly religious viewers to make it sound like scientists are saying souls are created at conception.
imagine if vegan activists began arguing that we shouldn't hurt sea sponges because "science confirms they're animals". that may seem like a reasonable argument for someone who doesn't know what animals are because they likely think the word "animal " is a synonym for sentient creatures, the same way the religious right thinks of souls when they hear the word "life".

>>105596
Scientists don’t say anything about souls because even by religious understanding they’re immaterial and so outside of the scope of science. But if you bring stuff like souls into the debate you’re entering the realm of religious morality. That’s considered objective by believers, and best challenged with scripture rather than vague semantics.
If you (fourth person, not YOU you) start from a point of view”I don’t care about religion so no one else should” you’ll just talk past people with different axioms.

>>105596
I swear there has to be a secret foid on the Zarty echoing radfem talking points in words words words paragraphs for the past few months PLEASE TELL US YOU'RE THE FEMALE ZARYAN!!!

>>105600
>female
>zaryan

>>105601
I have gathered top WEF funded soyentists and they have caculated in a snopes approved peer reviewed study that there will be exactly one female Zaryan within the Zarty's entire history, and my Foid Detector TM has captured a foid signature lurking on this very thread... it has to be the one. Do you know what kind of discovery that would make? I would be the most revered man in soyentific history right along with Dr Soyberg and Fauci ximself...