Ongezellig
IAZ and soft NAZ
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 126 | Views: 4 | Currently viewing: 1
The more time you spend online the more likely you'll turn out chuddy
Source: myself
>i just wanna sit in my room, hecking goon to tentacle hentai and play the sims while watching markiplier WHILE admiring hitler's paintings
there's nothing political about admiring 18's lovely landscapes
I think maya would use crystal cafe brcsuse its more nicer i guess
>groomcow.fACKrms
No
>the 'fe
Perhaps although she would probably hate how stuck up in the ass the other foids are
everything about maya screams out to me that she deeply cherishes males or something, especially if they're half human half mollusk
always have though, battlefield 1 proves that to be true.
Well they were used as cannon fodder
they were also test subjects but that's a whole nother thing
actually I take that back, it would probably just be the foid section of Kiwifarms in general
Ok I guess she probably wouldn't post on those threads now that I think about it buuuuut she would definitely be a lurker. Even on the internet she can't socialize with other people, she can only watch.
>>82091
Maya isn’t racist. the reason the women on those spaces hate men is for a lot of the same reasons whites hate browns, they’re violent chimps who can’t control their sexual urges, commit the vast majority of the crime, and have little empathy. if Maya doesn’t hate browns, then she most likely won’t hate men either.
niggers and troons lined up to be executed in front of quVVn Maya btw
Maya would be one of those chicks that talk about "brown pride" and "decolonising the schools" while having a White boyfriend
evendoe she was the only one who was not taken aback by the Belgian TND, do not listen to this ilsed psyop
even doe (You) all look like this
>>82109
>the reason the women on those spaces hate men is for a lot of the same reasons whites hate browns
>they’re violent chimps who can’t control their sexual urges, commit the vast majority of the crime, and have little empathy.
Not even remotely true.
Women, on average, are more psychopathic than men and consequently more likely to be the perpetrator in homicide and assault cases when:
-
The 'playing field' is even. See: lesbian couple domestic abuse statistics.
-
They are in a dominant position relative to their victim. See:
Juana Barraza, professional wrestler who killed 42-48 victims (16 confirmed, 30+ suspected) all of which were elderly women, by entering their houses by pretending to be a nurse or social worker, and strangling them with objects she found inside their houses, specifially cords and stockings.
Dagmar Overbye, who killed 25 children including one of her own through drowning, strangulation and burning alive.
Jane Toppan, nurse who confessed to killing 31 patients (12 confirmed, 100+ suspected) by overdosing them on morphine. She confessed to committing the murders in order to satisfy her sexual fetish and "to have killed more people -helpless people- than any other man or woman who ever lived"
Miyuki Ishikawa, midwife who killed 103~ newborns (was indicted for 27 but sentenced for 5, reportedly as high as 87 in police investigation) through criminal negligence. It's important to note that other midwives were complicit in her murders, none of which were ever charged for aiding/abetting (she was apprehended only after police discovered the corpses of newborns), and that she was sentenced to eight years, which was halved to four in an appeal. Also see: Women-are-wonderful effect (phenomenon of women receiving lesser crimimal charges)
Beverley Allitt, nurse who murdered four children by overdosing them on insulin. -
They are in possession of weapons. See: Aileen Wuornos, serial killer who shot 7 men to death with her defense being that they tried to rape her; she later confessed to willingly having intercourse with each victim for pay.
>"I killed those men, robbed them as cold as ice. And I'd do it again, too."
>"There's no chance in keeping me alive or anything, because I'd kill again. I have hate crawling through my system." -Aileen Wuornos
'Men are more violent than women' is a blatantly false take on a complex evolutionary issue, propagated mainly by Jewish scholars. Sigmund Freud is a rare exception to this, read his 'penis envy' theory in detail (to summarise: he attempts to explain how women are just as, if not more violent than men; they only not have the natural means to realize their violence through action).
I know no one is going to read this but someone has to say the truth.
Dunno man, there are way more serial killer guys and such. I blame soyciety for this, due to them, over the past 60 years, ignoring and neglecting men. Its like the nigger proverb about man burn down village for warmth o algo.
- there is more man on man violence than woman on woman violence
- men commit the vast majority of animal abuse, child sexual abuse, and elder abuse. men do not have anymore of an advantage over the victims of these crimes than women, yet they’re still significantly more likely to commit them.
- even when accounting for the sex gap in weapon ownership, men are still more likely to kill with weapons. if what you’re saying is true, you’d expect there to be more female mass shooters.
you’re mostly just pointing fingers and saying “see, women can be just as evil”. the fact that female serial killers exist means nothing. this is the equivalent of when Xitter users bring up random white criminals whenever confronted with crime statistics. no one is saying that whites never commit crimes ever, they argue that they’re less likely to.
also, i don’t genuinely believe what i said in >>82109 , i was explaining why these women hate men. i probably should’ve said “they believe”.
Still crazy how fucked up western society is that it allows killing of its own children
You WILL sacrifice your own child to Moloch and you WILL be happy
I wasn't doing whataboutism per se, just giving some notable examples.
She's a privilidged first worlder that doesnt have to face the realities of class society so she's most likely some kind of liberal. Probably socially progressive given hee hobbies and sex.
Youre technically killing millions of childrrn every once in a while by not having sex as sperm eventually gets rrabsorbed by the body.
Society has to draw the line between human and clump of cells somewhere, so why not have it be somewhere useful that increases economic attainment and reduces childbirth mortality etc.
Fetuses arent even conscious in the time where they are allowed to be qborted so whats the difference between them and a sperm cell.
One is just more human shaped.
Most privilidged first worlders eventually have to get a job and first world economies are getting shittier and more unsustainable. Housing crisises, economic inequality etc,
I said doesnt have to face realities of class spciety bcuz shes a student and lives in a well off household.
Hopefully these countries get poorer so something happens.
I do have a job
>Housing crisises
Nothingburger, boomers are dying off
>economic inequality
Nothingburger, equality is impossible without slavery anyway
>Hopefully these countries get poorer so something happens.
Nah, the rich will get richer and the brown poorer
The hosuing crisis isnt about overpopulation, it is landowners artificially jacking up prices by buying housing en masse. We have more than enough housing, it just isnt affordable. Most people will never be able to own a home. This is a huge change.
Economic inequality has deepened and is currently one of the main friction points. It isnt so ething to be ignored. The average americans wage isnt increasing with inflation. As business owners try and find more and more ways to increase profits, life will get worse, and government repression of labor will deepen.
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 126 | Views: 4 | Currently viewing: 1