International Politics
or something
ZWABAG
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 118 | Views: 3 | Currently viewing: 1
>>12168
>southern shitalians are still 50-60% euro you can't deny that
Turks are ≈55% white if speaking strict. Most caucasians are ≈60% white. Ashkenazim and Mauritalians are ≈70% white. I'm not going to summarize all the non and white admixtures because he's mainly a mix of nons between themselves and only 25% irish. So basically only 25% properly white ancestry. I bet, even balkan turks would pass as white with a more probability than Nick. Lmao.
>>12169
Mathcuck, his white european ancestry is leveled out by mexicans, so basically he's still moor-tier white.
>>12173
Not gonna deny that but serbians are actually european but still too southern for me so I still haye 'em
>>12177
Only one percent pass as white. Gegging so hard rn.
>>12179
False. 94% Americans don't even have any non admixtures in them.
>>12183
>IQ changes your race
Hapa Mymy-Maya-fag pedo cult ITT, shut it down
>>12184
>Andronovo pakistanis
Whom the fuck are you implying
>Bronze age aryans I mean
...
>southern shitalians are still 50-60% euro you can't deny that
Turks are ≈55% white if speaking strict. Most caucasians are ≈60% white. Ashkenazim and Mauritalians are ≈70% white. I'm not going to summarize all the non and white admixtures because he's mainly a mix of nons between themselves and only 25% irish. So basically only 25% properly white ancestry. I bet, even balkan turks would pass as white with a more probability than Nick. Lmao.
>>12169
Mathcuck, his white european ancestry is leveled out by mexicans, so basically he's still moor-tier white.
>>12173
Not gonna deny that but serbians are actually european but still too southern for me so I still haye 'em
>>12177
Only one percent pass as white. Gegging so hard rn.
>>12179
False. 94% Americans don't even have any non admixtures in them.
>>12183
>IQ changes your race
Hapa Mymy-Maya-fag pedo cult ITT, shut it down
>>12184
>Andronovo pakistanis
Whom the fuck are you implying
>Bronze age aryans I mean
...
>>12185
>Turks are ≈55% white if speaking strict
That's very few turks lol. maybe the ones who live in the european continent part of the country.
>Ashkenazim and Mauritalians are ≈70% white.
ashkenazism are not that white lol. italians might be true but ashkenazism are literally as white as southern italians like you said with sometimes a bit of germanic and slavic on them.
>Mathcuck, his white european ancestry is leveled out by mexicans, so basically he's still moor-tier white.
Mexican isn't an ethnicity. we don't know if his parents were 1% criollos or literal natives.
>False. 94% Americans don't even have any non admixtures in them.
true.
>>IQ changes your race
i was not implying this, they are still white (depending on how you view it) they're just low iq and unreliable.
>Only one percent pass as white. Gegging so hard rn.
cucking millions of latinx with 80% white ancestry
>Turks are ≈55% white if speaking strict
That's very few turks lol. maybe the ones who live in the european continent part of the country.
>Ashkenazim and Mauritalians are ≈70% white.
ashkenazism are not that white lol. italians might be true but ashkenazism are literally as white as southern italians like you said with sometimes a bit of germanic and slavic on them.
>Mathcuck, his white european ancestry is leveled out by mexicans, so basically he's still moor-tier white.
Mexican isn't an ethnicity. we don't know if his parents were 1% criollos or literal natives.
>False. 94% Americans don't even have any non admixtures in them.
true.
>>IQ changes your race
i was not implying this, they are still white (depending on how you view it) they're just low iq and unreliable.
>Only one percent pass as white. Gegging so hard rn.
cucking millions of latinx with 80% white ancestry
>Whom the fuck are you implying
im anthropology babbling too hard here sorry
im anthropology babbling too hard here sorry
heres my honest opinion on latinx whiteness
>20-50%
not even, europeans are literally closer to afghanis/tajiks/tatars than they are to this tier of euro ancestry latinx
>50-60%
euro-adjacent but not "aryan" or closely related to northern europeans in any way. connection to spanish/iberians is present but i wouldn't call these people white honestly lol
>60-75%
European and white but still not "aryan". even stronger conection to iberians but weak connection to northern europeans.
>75-85%
European, not sure about how aryan these people are but it depends on how much beringian or ssa they have
>85-100%
basically white european and aryan with the only exception being is that they have too much subsaharan like brazilians.
>20-50%
not even, europeans are literally closer to afghanis/tajiks/tatars than they are to this tier of euro ancestry latinx
>50-60%
euro-adjacent but not "aryan" or closely related to northern europeans in any way. connection to spanish/iberians is present but i wouldn't call these people white honestly lol
>60-75%
European and white but still not "aryan". even stronger conection to iberians but weak connection to northern europeans.
>75-85%
European, not sure about how aryan these people are but it depends on how much beringian or ssa they have
>85-100%
basically white european and aryan with the only exception being is that they have too much subsaharan like brazilians.
>>12188
this is excluding middle eastern and assuming you are purely iberian in your european so this isn't counting all of the white argentiniaGOD ethnics who have northern euro in them
this is excluding middle eastern and assuming you are purely iberian in your european so this isn't counting all of the white argentiniaGOD ethnics who have northern euro in them
>>12186
>That's very few turks lol. maybe the ones who live in the european continent part of the country
I'm referring to their principal components, not what you think.
>>Ashkenazism are not that white lol. italians might be true but ashkenazism are literally as white as southern italians like you said with sometimes a bit of germanic and slavic on them.
>Ashkenazim
Firstly, geg. Secondly, "Mauritalians" stood for the southern italians in that very sentence.
>Mexican isn't an ethnicity. we don't know if his parents were 1% criollos or literal natives
Whataboutism
>>i was not implying this, they are still white (depending on how you view it) they're just low iq and unreliable
>if you're low IQ but white enough we still won't consider you white bcs low IQ is a nigger trait kek!
Am I reading you right?
>80% white is enough
What about 80% white and 20% negro? Pushkin doesn't seem to be a very european example. So I don't think 20% non-europeoid isn't significant.
>>12187
I know who are the Andronovo aryans. I can't comprehend the reason you called them pakistanis.
>That's very few turks lol. maybe the ones who live in the european continent part of the country
I'm referring to their principal components, not what you think.
>>Ashkenazism are not that white lol. italians might be true but ashkenazism are literally as white as southern italians like you said with sometimes a bit of germanic and slavic on them.
>Ashkenazim
Firstly, geg. Secondly, "Mauritalians" stood for the southern italians in that very sentence.
>Mexican isn't an ethnicity. we don't know if his parents were 1% criollos or literal natives
Whataboutism
>>i was not implying this, they are still white (depending on how you view it) they're just low iq and unreliable
>if you're low IQ but white enough we still won't consider you white bcs low IQ is a nigger trait kek!
Am I reading you right?
>80% white is enough
What about 80% white and 20% negro? Pushkin doesn't seem to be a very european example. So I don't think 20% non-europeoid isn't significant.
>>12187
I know who are the Andronovo aryans. I can't comprehend the reason you called them pakistanis.
>>12189
>Whataboutism
not a whataboutism latinx aren't one uniform ethnic blob they aren't even a fucking race
>Firstly, geg.
ok so 50% levantine ashkenazis are white-passing now? askhenazis are literally closer to palestinians than they are to germans.
>Am I reading you right?
No they are still white. being dysgenic does not exclude you from a race in any way
>Whataboutism
not a whataboutism latinx aren't one uniform ethnic blob they aren't even a fucking race
>Firstly, geg.
ok so 50% levantine ashkenazis are white-passing now? askhenazis are literally closer to palestinians than they are to germans.
>Am I reading you right?
No they are still white. being dysgenic does not exclude you from a race in any way
>I'm referring to their principal components, not what you think.
So you mean like the elite of turkey?
>What about 80% white and 20% negro? Pushkin doesn't seem to be a very european example. So I don't think 20% non-europeoid isn't significant.
20% negro would be an outlier in white latinxes. african ancestry is pretty rare in large amounts amd even amongst pardos and brazilian "negro" it's something like 30-50%. HOWEVER, you do have a point and there is a need to differentiate negro from beringian and middle eastern since the former is extremly genetically distant in comparison. it's mostly 0-4% in most latinx including their "white" substrate and i think it would be fair to denote anything above 6-14% african ancestry in whites as unfitting for the status of being officially european or white. although still euro-adjacent but obviously not put in with all of europeans. most "white" latinx also can get lumped into this.
So you mean like the elite of turkey?
>What about 80% white and 20% negro? Pushkin doesn't seem to be a very european example. So I don't think 20% non-europeoid isn't significant.
20% negro would be an outlier in white latinxes. african ancestry is pretty rare in large amounts amd even amongst pardos and brazilian "negro" it's something like 30-50%. HOWEVER, you do have a point and there is a need to differentiate negro from beringian and middle eastern since the former is extremly genetically distant in comparison. it's mostly 0-4% in most latinx including their "white" substrate and i think it would be fair to denote anything above 6-14% african ancestry in whites as unfitting for the status of being officially european or white. although still euro-adjacent but obviously not put in with all of europeans. most "white" latinx also can get lumped into this.
>>12195
So yes, 20% non-europeoid is mostly fine or acceptable as long as there isn't too much subsaharan lumped in or it's purely just subsaharan. it would still genetically lump you close to europeans if it was something like 80% european 10% middle eastern 8% beringian 2% SSA just as an example.
So yes, 20% non-europeoid is mostly fine or acceptable as long as there isn't too much subsaharan lumped in or it's purely just subsaharan. it would still genetically lump you close to europeans if it was something like 80% european 10% middle eastern 8% beringian 2% SSA just as an example.
You can be european and white but still not aryan. there is a difference between euro-adjacent groups (WHG,ANF,EEF) and yamnaya and having little yamnaya or steppe ancestry makes you automatically non-aryan. i'd say anyone below 30% steppe can't be classified as aryan which even most greeks have
>>12192
>>Firstly, geg
>So ashkenazim are white?
No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.
>You're not reading me right
Ok
>>12195
>You meant the elite of Turkey?
I meant the whole pop. "Principal" means "basal" or "basic". However, being ESL is aryan, fnf pedos on da shardee told me so!
>>12195
Beringians? You mean North-Eastern Asians? I tend to equate them to negroes, since both are non-europeoid (europeoid = caucasoid in the broad meaning).
>>12195
Let's just conclude that:
>more than 10% of +- pure mongols and negroes (and the corresponding ancestral pops) is illiquid
>and that more than 20% of non-european (= non-white) europeoid components is illiquid as well
>it would still genetically lump you close to europeans if it was something like 80% european 10% middle eastern 8% beringian 2% SSA just as an example
Yes but it's not what most of the latingos represent.
>>12197
Why is the border 30%? Why not higher? Why not lower? And lol a lot of southern euros have lower than 30%, such as greeks, italians, spaniards, etc., I would even say the most of them.
>>Firstly, geg
>So ashkenazim are white?
No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.
>You're not reading me right
Ok
>>12195
>You meant the elite of Turkey?
I meant the whole pop. "Principal" means "basal" or "basic". However, being ESL is aryan, fnf pedos on da shardee told me so!
>>12195
Beringians? You mean North-Eastern Asians? I tend to equate them to negroes, since both are non-europeoid (europeoid = caucasoid in the broad meaning).
>>12195
Let's just conclude that:
>more than 10% of +- pure mongols and negroes (and the corresponding ancestral pops) is illiquid
>and that more than 20% of non-european (= non-white) europeoid components is illiquid as well
>it would still genetically lump you close to europeans if it was something like 80% european 10% middle eastern 8% beringian 2% SSA just as an example
Yes but it's not what most of the latingos represent.
>>12197
Why is the border 30%? Why not higher? Why not lower? And lol a lot of southern euros have lower than 30%, such as greeks, italians, spaniards, etc., I would even say the most of them.
>>12197
>No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.
my bad
>I meant the whole pop. "Principal" means "basal" or "basic". However, being ESL is aryan, fnf pedos on da shardee told me so!
ok
>Beringians? You mean North-Eastern Asians? I tend to equate them to negroes, since both are non-europeoid (europeoid = caucasoid in the broad meaning).
Native americans. they're still eurasian and them and europeans share ancient north eurasian ancestry which doesn't make them in any way close to europeans however it is worth tossing them in a different group from negros since negros aren't even related to most of humanity and are completely different to our own. their skull shapes scream of this.
>Yes but it's not what most of the latingos represent.
Yes we latingos arent white
>Why is the border 30%?
includes most europeans except obviously for the groups you are mentioning which btw greeks and spaniards i think average around 30%. they can still be white and european but being aryan is exclusive sorry lol
>Why not lower?
saar we 25% steppe white SAAAR BRAHMIN SAAAAR
>No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.
my bad
>I meant the whole pop. "Principal" means "basal" or "basic". However, being ESL is aryan, fnf pedos on da shardee told me so!
ok
>Beringians? You mean North-Eastern Asians? I tend to equate them to negroes, since both are non-europeoid (europeoid = caucasoid in the broad meaning).
Native americans. they're still eurasian and them and europeans share ancient north eurasian ancestry which doesn't make them in any way close to europeans however it is worth tossing them in a different group from negros since negros aren't even related to most of humanity and are completely different to our own. their skull shapes scream of this.
>Yes but it's not what most of the latingos represent.
Yes we latingos arent white
>Why is the border 30%?
includes most europeans except obviously for the groups you are mentioning which btw greeks and spaniards i think average around 30%. they can still be white and european but being aryan is exclusive sorry lol
>Why not lower?
saar we 25% steppe white SAAAR BRAHMIN SAAAAR
File:
1784480944243.jpeg
(370.93 KB, 2119x1949, nigga.jpg)
>>12199
>Native Americans are still eurasian
Idc about eurasians but west eurasians (europeans), Half-white-half-latino will be roughly grouped with MENA arabs.
>however it is worth tossing them in a different group from negros
I consider them to be one of the main "human" races, so I only put them into the group of the originally non-white main races (non-white europeoids are basically mulattos yuo know)
>since negros aren't even related to most of humanity
Idc about the "global humanity"
>and are completely different to our own.
"Our"?
>their skull shapes scream of this.
Also the skeleton, nervous system, muscles, and everything else too. Just like Asians.
>includes most europeans except obviously for the groups you are mentioning which btw greeks and spaniards i think average around 30%. they can still be white and european but being aryan is exclusive sorry lol
I consider anyone with WHG+WSH=>50% a northerner and I think it is logical to connect "aryanness" with this "northernness", that's to say I equate the terms "aryan" and "north-european" sometimes, but really the most WSH peoples among whites are Celto-Germanics followed by other northerners like Balts, Slavs and Finns.
>Native Americans are still eurasian
Idc about eurasians but west eurasians (europeans), Half-white-half-latino will be roughly grouped with MENA arabs.
>however it is worth tossing them in a different group from negros
I consider them to be one of the main "human" races, so I only put them into the group of the originally non-white main races (non-white europeoids are basically mulattos yuo know)
>since negros aren't even related to most of humanity
Idc about the "global humanity"
>and are completely different to our own.
"Our"?
>their skull shapes scream of this.
Also the skeleton, nervous system, muscles, and everything else too. Just like Asians.
>includes most europeans except obviously for the groups you are mentioning which btw greeks and spaniards i think average around 30%. they can still be white and european but being aryan is exclusive sorry lol
I consider anyone with WHG+WSH=>50% a northerner and I think it is logical to connect "aryanness" with this "northernness", that's to say I equate the terms "aryan" and "north-european" sometimes, but really the most WSH peoples among whites are Celto-Germanics followed by other northerners like Balts, Slavs and Finns.
I don't agree about making 80% euros non-white in all cases since it's not practical but you have completely beaten me here. good work.
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 118 | Views: 3 | Currently viewing: 1