[Home/Overboard/Stats] [g] [calm/brabant/drenthe/q/qa/zellig] [booru/wiki] [v] [Rules/Contacts] [Search]
[ Register / Settings / Log in ]

Ongezellig

IAZ and soft NAZ

Thread list Index Catalog

ZWABAG
Quick reply [X]

[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 19 | Views: 2 | Currently viewing: 1
Zaryan No.93363
File: 1784504275417.png (1.25 MB, 1080x1080, 99174 - SoyBooru.png)
mymy is 15 you sick fucks
Zaryan No.93368
File: 1784504275417.png (51.81 KB, 1662x832, GOOOOOOOOOOOOO.png)
agugu is 1
Zaryan No.93372
Average zartyfag is 15 as well btw
Zaryan No.93398
Honeypot Mossad CIA thread trying to guess your age, fuck off glownigger scum
>>93372
Average age to use the site is above 18 btw
Zaryan No.93429
File: 1784504275417.jpeg (34.39 KB, 763x537, 1748244822625.jpg)
16 but tsmt
Let me speak my peace: zellig porn no matter what will always be horrible and if you goon to it get some fucking therapy
Already gooning is wrong, but let's dive a bit deeper into this shit
If it's adults gooning to the zellig characters, that's pedophilia unless if it's literally only vera or the parents or something
If it's people the same age as the characters, that's worse, that's literally fucking epi
So it's always either pedophilia or epi
And always well, porn too, porn itself is bad.
Zaryan No.93447
File: 1784504275417.gif (16.10 MB, 851x894, 1750519154925a.gif)
>>93429
>
Kill all pedophiles, TPD TGD
Zaryan No.93456
>>93429
masturbating to presumably adult characters is not pedophilia. even if the NSFW artists in question explicitly state that they're their canonical age, it's still not pedophilia because 16 is post-pubescent.
Zaryan No.93458
>>93456
that's still bad though.
Zaryan No.93463
>>93456
I mean if they don't look like kids in the porn trve ig but still borderline and creepy since you know they are 16 while gooning
That's still fucked up shit
Zaryan No.93466
>>93456
its fucked up no matter how you put it.
Zaryan No.93471
>>93429
gooning is bad either way
Zaryan No.93569
gooning is bad either way
Zaryan No.93574
so what? nothing in here is sexual
Zaryan No.93636
File: 1784504275417.jpeg (501.53 KB, 3261x3073, IMG_6989.jpg)
>>93398
no cuz there was a poll loke a year ago I think and most were below 18
Zaryan No.93637
>>93458
>fulfilling your sexual needs in the most natural manner that is commonly found in nature while looking at physically mature specimens is bad, because it's just is okay?
Zaryan No.93638
>>93636
so what you're saying is they're 1+ year older now?
Zaryan No.93639
File: 1784504275417.png (43.58 KB, 721x720, goonerson.png)
>bro jerking off is so natural guys, i just need to be natural and not a heckin' cuckslave o also asi
Zaryan No.93642
>>93639
watching and looking at depictions of naughty things real or otherwise is bad.
ejaculating is natural though, there's a reason animals besides humans do it while in captivity, it's just that it's meant to be done with a female.
masturbation isn't a horrible alternative though, as long as your using your imagination, because unless you're crazy there's no reason your imagination should hurt you.
Zaryan No.93644
>>93642
I mostly agree, although I was quoting particularly the part about looking at porn, because that's where the real danger lies as pornography is an inherently addictive and corrupting substance that rots people's minds and souls. Reverting to a non porn-induced sexuality, masturbation is no longer excessive and not that harmaful
Post actions

[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 19 | Views: 2 | Currently viewing: 1