Ongezellig
IAZ and soft NAZ
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 45 | Views: 2 | Currently viewing: 1
well i ask you my dear, why did you delete the one with this image then? answer me
it wasn't the posts inside the thread. someone had made a detailed edit of vera from deel 6 with her boots off and you deleted it. then, a year old thread with the mymy feet image on OP got bumped, and you deleted that year old thread and thus deleted history, even though the thread was inactive for a year, just to spite that poster. so you can't say it was the posts inside the thread because it was up for a year with no new posts until that moment. don't try to rewrite history. then why is this >>6727 not getting the same treatment?
probably because jannies aren't a monolith, they just act on clitty impulse
obsessed moralfag like you is what killing the site with your paranoia
>death wish boogeyman boogeyman
just confirming my opinion no person with IQ above 60 would leak for 24h straight over a 1 year old image
>btw I'm goung to make a thread about my gooncoal to the zarty
>WHAT?? tHEY... LE DELETED MY THREAD FOR BEING GOONCOAL? REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE FUCK YOU MODS
Why are footfags like this?
I do think that's the question, why was a year old shitpost with a shitty aliased drawing of feet nuked?
days without zaryans being generalized because of 1-2 niggers: -1
>>85424
Let me simply it for you
-Case 1:
A thread that was forgotten for 1 year gets necrobumped. The OP image is mymy with her feet on the table. The year-old thread gets deleted, the reason given being "he must have bumped this thread to be an annoying faggot, let's delete it."
-Case 2:
A thread that was forgotten for 1 year gets necrobumped. The OP image is zelligs dressed as whores, their panties and bras visible, with clear sexual undertones. The year-old thread doesn't get deleted, with the reason given being "it was a different time"
Do you see the discrepancy between these two situations?
i do albeit, i was just joking.
i did hear once that one of the mods for this site was...
well you know...
it's probably over until zoot does something, preferably he just deletes both threads because they're still depicted as teenagers in both of those respective images.
and that's wrong and creepy.
Justice for the 1 year old thread with OP image of mymy with her feet on the table. it got deleted unjustly, according to the claims of the current administration!
on /q/, to defend not deleting >>>/zellig/6727 , Zoot has said:
>>>/q/5434
>Why make drama out of this image? Back then nobody had a problem with it
>It doesn't have a camel toe, it doesn't have nipples
Why was this same argument not applied to the mymy feet thread, then? it had no camel toe, it had no nipples!
Not to mention this same image, and the one with vera's feet got deleted from the Zooru too, yet zute insists on keeping the OTHER goonbait image.
Zoot, Zute, we demand and answer to >>>/q/5469
>image gets deleted
janny coup or zoot buckled, call it
What is going on, the website is just falling apart at this point
>inb4 banned because the jannies are that big of a tranny
right he should have left it up to spite the "drama" instead. you should have just said that in the first place instead of pretending it was because the image wasn't sexual. the artist draws porn, it has bimbo proportions and clothing, it was drawn to be goonbait. that's completely different to the wholesome beach image you attached in bad faith.
very gullible if you believe that. You should get your dogs in check.
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 45 | Views: 2 | Currently viewing: 1