Ongezellig
IAZ and soft NAZ
ZWABAG
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 199 | Views: 6 | Currently viewing: 1
>>55275
do people here actually think agugu is a gem? i thought it was the zarty equivalent of spadeson posting and everyone hated it
do people here actually think agugu is a gem? i thought it was the zarty equivalent of spadeson posting and everyone hated it
by my estimate around all of the thread's replies are samefaggery, Zaryans wons, billions must listen to the VOC song
>>55279
im the op and a ctrl+f shows me that 42 of this threads replies were me, so atleast 100 were actual zartycucks
im the op and a ctrl+f shows me that 42 of this threads replies were me, so atleast 100 were actual zartycucks
>>55281
a third of the replies being you is genuinely fucking embarrassing, this is still a Zaryan victory
a third of the replies being you is genuinely fucking embarrassing, this is still a Zaryan victory
File:
1784501891601.mp4
(4.43 MB, 480x640, 1735506460115.mp4)
>>55278
Personally hate it
I even posted video of me it burning a few times.
>>55283
the majority of this thread of a sprawled out debate about race between me and 1 other guy lol, its not as if i only had a 1 to 3 bait to reply ratio
the majority of this thread of a sprawled out debate about race between me and 1 other guy lol, its not as if i only had a 1 to 3 bait to reply ratio
>>55286
it is though, you're still sucking my BWC by replying to every sage I make
it is though, you're still sucking my BWC by replying to every sage I make
>>55289
why would you even sage on a website like this? it has a pph of like 3 if a thread is at the top of the 'log its staying for a week at least
why would you even sage on a website like this? it has a pph of like 3 if a thread is at the top of the 'log its staying for a week at least
>>55278
>i thought it was the zarty equivalent of spadeson posting and everyone hated it
left zarty in june award
>i thought it was the zarty equivalent of spadeson posting and everyone hated it
left zarty in june award
File:
1784501891601.png
(247.24 KB, 1065x604, Soyshoetheory.png)
File:
1784501891601.png
(17.01 KB, 421x498, 1741 - mymy niggerwiggle soyjak.png)
>>55209
>race as we currently understand definitely is not the greatest framework for looking at genetics. the simple categories of "black", "white", "asian" etc. come nowhere close to providing an adequate lense for looking at genetic differences, because their socially constructed categories based on simple factors like skin tone, which are shared in population as disparate as sub-saharan africans and aboriginal australians
>socially constructed category
When you call a category a "socially constructed category", you imply there are some categories that are not socially constructed. It is not possible to have such a category, simply because categories are names belonging to a language about which there is (or isn't) a social consensus as to what they mean. Therefore, it makes no sense to use the term, unless you use it for its emotional salience, to label some categories as "fake" and other as "true".
>the simple categories of "black", "white", "asian" etc. come nowhere close to providing an adequate lense for looking at genetic differences
Obviously, full genome sequencing will give you more information about a person than just a racial label. It doesn't mean that there don't exist such groups as "black", "white" or "Asian" sharing common evolutionary history and thus exhibiting genetic and phenotypic similarities.
>categories based on simple factors like skin tone
Actually, they are based on genetic distances, skin tone (and other phenotypic features like skull shape, intelligence or propensity for violence) is just an evolutionary adaptation developed to deal with the features of environment a given population evolved in (like the intensity of sunlight) and as you have noticed yourself, different populations evolving in separate, but similar environments can develop similar phenotypes.
>race as we currently understand definitely is not the greatest framework for looking at genetics. the simple categories of "black", "white", "asian" etc. come nowhere close to providing an adequate lense for looking at genetic differences, because their socially constructed categories based on simple factors like skin tone, which are shared in population as disparate as sub-saharan africans and aboriginal australians
>socially constructed category
When you call a category a "socially constructed category", you imply there are some categories that are not socially constructed. It is not possible to have such a category, simply because categories are names belonging to a language about which there is (or isn't) a social consensus as to what they mean. Therefore, it makes no sense to use the term, unless you use it for its emotional salience, to label some categories as "fake" and other as "true".
>the simple categories of "black", "white", "asian" etc. come nowhere close to providing an adequate lense for looking at genetic differences
Obviously, full genome sequencing will give you more information about a person than just a racial label. It doesn't mean that there don't exist such groups as "black", "white" or "Asian" sharing common evolutionary history and thus exhibiting genetic and phenotypic similarities.
>categories based on simple factors like skin tone
Actually, they are based on genetic distances, skin tone (and other phenotypic features like skull shape, intelligence or propensity for violence) is just an evolutionary adaptation developed to deal with the features of environment a given population evolved in (like the intensity of sunlight) and as you have noticed yourself, different populations evolving in separate, but similar environments can develop similar phenotypes.
>>55301
humanity has nowhere near the genetic diversity required for the sweeping racial superiority/inferiority arguments you are making, on average 2 random humans will share 99.99% of their dna
humanity has nowhere near the genetic diversity required for the sweeping racial superiority/inferiority arguments you are making, on average 2 random humans will share 99.99% of their dna
>>55304
Calm down your clitty.
>on average 2 random humans will share 99.99% of their dna
What percent of DNA a random person shares with a cucumber (also random)?
Calm down your clitty.
>on average 2 random humans will share 99.99% of their dna
What percent of DNA a random person shares with a cucumber (also random)?
>>55305
"Small" genetic distances make big differences. And yeah, not 99,9%, but 99,5-7% (depending on the group).
>ev&oe niggers have up to 20% of homo erectus admixture
>evendoe asians have a relatively significant denisovian admixture
>evendoe europeans have some neanderthal admixture
>whatever, sage the thread
"Small" genetic distances make big differences. And yeah, not 99,9%, but 99,5-7% (depending on the group).
>ev&oe niggers have up to 20% of homo erectus admixture
>evendoe asians have a relatively significant denisovian admixture
>evendoe europeans have some neanderthal admixture
>whatever, sage the thread
>>55308
Cucumber? If you was a vegetable, you would be a cuckumber. Stop leaking, shitalo sister.
Cucumber? If you was a vegetable, you would be a cuckumber. Stop leaking, shitalo sister.
>>55312
im not new the point is most quotes here are like this but no one points it out
im not new the point is most quotes here are like this but no one points it out
File:
1784501891601.jpeg
(129.94 KB, 1170x1156, IMG_20240414_181324_688.jpg)
>>55313
U wuz a de cuckumba yo pigskin
U wuz a de cuckumba yo pigskin
>File (hide): 1703892292750.png (269.93 KB, 522x510, Sad_Spongebob.png)
>Why is this community so weird Zaryan 9 days ago No.2215 [Reply]
>I just wanna enjoy cute cartoon girls, why do ya'll have to slap nazis and wars and racism into everything
This thread.
>Why is this community so weird Zaryan 9 days ago No.2215 [Reply]
>I just wanna enjoy cute cartoon girls, why do ya'll have to slap nazis and wars and racism into everything
This thread.
>>55114
Holy clittyleak if you hate the Zaryans so much why don't you just go back to xitter instead of complaining about the "le heckin' chuds" on their OWN site? How retarded can you get? Sageing the bait thread, disgusting, truthfully.
Holy clittyleak if you hate the Zaryans so much why don't you just go back to xitter instead of complaining about the "le heckin' chuds" on their OWN site? How retarded can you get? Sageing the bait thread, disgusting, truthfully.
>>55114
Anyone with developed frontal robe will likely not care about /pol/ and racism, if they don't like the fact that the majority of the fan base are racist then they just got filtered from the community which is a good thing. personally I don't give a shit about racism but hang around anyway. so maybe it's a (you) problem.
Anyone with developed frontal robe will likely not care about /pol/ and racism, if they don't like the fact that the majority of the fan base are racist then they just got filtered from the community which is a good thing. personally I don't give a shit about racism but hang around anyway. so maybe it's a (you) problem.
>>55218
>and we're basically at war with the ongezellig 'cord and subreddits
wtf does this mean
genuinely
>and we're basically at war with the ongezellig 'cord and subreddits
wtf does this mean
genuinely
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 199 | Views: 6 | Currently viewing: 1