Ongezellig
IAZ and soft NAZ
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 61 | Views: 5 | Currently viewing: 1
This site started as Zoot's personal 'cord and broke free from its restraints to evolve into something better
If only more admins had the same vision and footprint as he did
Zoot was a good man surrounded by shitskins, it took us 2 entire years to clear ourselves from literal filth. Really sad to see how many pedophiles were just embedded and as soon as they were found they immediately started crying and biting back, typical subversive behavior
Koos is Aryan omdat hij de site heeft gered van NZO
>Zoot's friends
Same people who leak about us btw, they developed a degree of oldfag dysphoria only comparable to de jerdeecocks somewhere around '23
the site's culture did change, as well as its original preconditions. it is very different from what it was.
if you mean anything other than ongezellig cancellation then i will 'ape you
When the site was used by his discord friends who also had a discord server on the side and when people started to actually use the site they developed instant oldfag trannyphoria eventually resulting in specimens like Zute or Nook and/or others
>>122682
ongezellig's "cancellation" is one reason. then you have the radical change of the sharty (the zarty was a glorified /zellig/ board and wasnt isolated from the sharty; people back then used both). idk why you would 'ape me for that.
>>122686
Nook was one of the original mods, not an "eventual specimen". Other than that i have no clue what you are talking about.
>When the site was used by his discord friends
it was used by all kinds of people. some didnt mind cord (if you avoid public servers, you'd be mostly fine), others didnt wish to use it (datamining + people associated it exclusively with anti-sharty servers).
there was also other divisions, like whether a person used mostly the sharty and used the zarty as a bunker (back then /qa/ was still descent), used both (zarty viewd as a hidden /zellig/ board on the sharty; most people back then) or used the zarty exclusively (that was rare at the beginning). i guess there were other divides, but my point is that it was far more complex and different than "it was used by his discord friends"
>who also had a discord server on the side
what are you referring to? the janny cord was for moderation. there was also that other cord zoot was a part of, but it wasnt sharty related, it was its own thing (not isolated from the zarty, but far from the site being "a discord server in anything but code").
>when people started to actually use the site
"actually use the site" is vague. and that time was? be more specific.
>they developed instant oldfag trannyphoria
the site at one point turned into chronic schizotalk about the same 6 deels and the bonus art, people trying to continue zellig themselves (multiple fails), complaining when some tried to expand the culture and newcacas acting like they know anything (replicating their idea of zarty culture without thinking).
>ongezellig's "cancellation" is one reason. then you have the radical change of the sharty (the zarty was a glorified /zellig/ board and wasnt isolated from the sharty; people back then used both). idk why you would 'ape me for that.
>
>>>122686
>Nook was one of the original mods, not an "eventual specimen". Other than that i have no clue what you are talking about.
>
>>When the site was used by his discord friends
>it was used by all kinds of people. some didnt mind cord (if you avoid public servers, you'd be mostly fine), others didnt wish to use it (datamining + people associated it exclusively with anti-sharty servers).
>
>there was also other divisions, like whether a person used mostly the sharty and used the zarty as a bunker (back then /qa/ was still descent), used both (zarty viewd as a hidden /zellig/ board on the sharty; most people back then) or used the zarty exclusively (that was rare at the beginning). i guess there were other divides, but my point is that it was far more complex and different than "it was used by his discord friends"
>
>>who also had a discord server on the side
>what are you referring to? the janny cord was for moderation. there was also that other cord zoot was a part of, but it wasnt sharty related, it was its own thing (not isolated from the zarty, but far from the site being "a discord server in anything but code").
>
>>when people started to actually use the site
>"actually use the site" is vague. and that time was? be more specific.
>
>>they developed instant oldfag trannyphoria
>the site at one point turned into chronic schizotalk about the same 6 deels and the bonus art, people trying to continue zellig themselves (multiple fails), complaining when some tried to expand the culture and newcacas acting like they know anything (replicating their idea of zarty culture without thinking).
so true
I don't need to address any points because I have seen what "that discord that was its own thing" and who browsed the site way back. Spoiler: a good chunk of them are on the Jassy right now, keep living in the (worse) past
>>122772
>i dont need to adress any points because i want to make stuff up
again with the vagueness. i was on the soysphere since Kuz era sharty. I have experience with how the site functioned and the community back then.
>I have seen what "that discord that was its own thing"
elaborate then. it was mostly snca private cord server. there was a server archive posted on the sharty a while back (late December of 23 iirc).
>Spoiler: a good chunk of them are on the Jassy right now
and how do you know this? what does that have to do with the past being "zoot and his cord buddies" (which you still havent clarified on what you mean by this or the other stuff)
>keep living in the (worse) past
lmao, you seem to have enjoyed it enough to still post here.
can snopes fact check ANY of this?
That's why I keep telling you live in the past, it's a cove of pedophiles with connections to the AIpedos of the old times, and yes Zute is in there, if someone has the archive on hand you can see it for yourself
just drop the evidence, i'm not going to argue about snca like others, but archives, ips etc. are always welcome
Kiwicacas are obsessed with archiving and phonebooking random SNCA
i don't care what kiwicacas do, bump this thread when you have anything substantive to show to support your claims
>shows no evidence for claims award
>convinced nobody award
you suck so much at arguing that it makes me agree with the other side, oldfags won if you are the best arguer against them
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 61 | Views: 5 | Currently viewing: 1