Ongezellig
IAZ and soft NAZ
ZWABAG
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 111 | Views: 5 | Currently viewing: 1
>>110627
I never said that at all. Please reread the prior post.
I said that people who live together for an extended period… and people who only hook up for a single night… both instigated their relationship the same way - sexual attraction.
>>110628
You said “The only difference in this context is the duration that the two people have dwelled together.” So what if they have not dwelled together? Then there is no difference and their relationship cannot be any deeper than two people having a one night stand.
You said “The only difference in this context is the duration that the two people have dwelled together.” So what if they have not dwelled together? Then there is no difference and their relationship cannot be any deeper than two people having a one night stand.
>>110629
> Then there is no difference and their relationship cannot be any deeper than two people having a one night stand.
It’s true. It sounds bleak, but relationships do not really extend any deeper than physicality. That’s why people cheat on each other so often, and why divorce rates are high in countries where it is easy to get divorces.
> Then there is no difference and their relationship cannot be any deeper than two people having a one night stand.
It’s true. It sounds bleak, but relationships do not really extend any deeper than physicality. That’s why people cheat on each other so often, and why divorce rates are high in countries where it is easy to get divorces.
File:
1784505316163.webm
(2.67 MB, 480x852, 1756959030293770.webm)
>I only see chicks as objects for my lust therefore everybody does and love isn't real
You will get an undiscovered illness that kills you within the next 5 years.
You will get an undiscovered illness that kills you within the next 5 years.
>>110630
Okay so you legitimately do not think the relationship between the two daters is any different than the one night stand?
Okay so you legitimately do not think the relationship between the two daters is any different than the one night stand?
>>110631
Have you ever had a girlfriend? If the answer is “no”, then how would you know anything about “love”? It only exists as a nebulous concept with your mind, inspired solely by escapist media which romanticizes the concept. That’s why your opinion on the topic isn’t realistic.
Have you ever had a girlfriend? If the answer is “no”, then how would you know anything about “love”? It only exists as a nebulous concept with your mind, inspired solely by escapist media which romanticizes the concept. That’s why your opinion on the topic isn’t realistic.
>>110632
No. There’s no magical “deep love” that appears in one of those relationships that doesn’t appear in the other. You can “love” someone’s behaviors and peculiarities… but you would find just as many lovable aspects within some other person if you found them sexually attractive.
No. There’s no magical “deep love” that appears in one of those relationships that doesn’t appear in the other. You can “love” someone’s behaviors and peculiarities… but you would find just as many lovable aspects within some other person if you found them sexually attractive.
>>110633
I have had a girlfriend, it sounds like projection in your case because once you find someone that enjoys your company you will understand and you'll stop falling for the pol memes
I have had a girlfriend, it sounds like projection in your case because once you find someone that enjoys your company you will understand and you'll stop falling for the pol memes
>>110635
Emphasis on “had”. She eventually left you? Can I take a wild guess that she is now currently dating someone who is more attractive than you?
Emphasis on “had”. She eventually left you? Can I take a wild guess that she is now currently dating someone who is more attractive than you?
>>110634
I agree physical connection and attraction is an important part of a romantic relationship, but acting like romantic relationships can never in any way be deeper than lust is silly.
I agree physical connection and attraction is an important part of a romantic relationship, but acting like romantic relationships can never in any way be deeper than lust is silly.
>>110637
There’s nothing deeper than lust… and there’s no example that you could provide that wouldn’t just be something you saw in some romantic anime.
There’s nothing deeper than lust… and there’s no example that you could provide that wouldn’t just be something you saw in some romantic anime.
File:
1784505316163.jpeg
(294.70 KB, 967x1061, Sheldon_Emry_Give_The_Devil_His_Due_Ch.6_p.11.jpg)
>>110624
>In reality, it is very common for soldiers to get cheated on when they are away…
It's maladaptive, in fact. Being socially destructive, it's the same base instinct that comes from the need for what we would call "romantic love", but since it's only an evolutionary instinct, it only pushes, and doesn't lead directly, so people often lead astray themselves. Although promiscuous immoral sex stems from good biological impulses, it essentially undermines their fulfillment. Exactly on this basis we have to distinguish more conscious attraction from simple internal urges. If you look deeper than you actually look, biology forces us to separate productive sexual relationships and their types (monogamous monoracial families) from incorrect ones (polygamous, interracial, homosexual, etc.).
>In reality, it is very common for soldiers to get cheated on when they are away…
It's maladaptive, in fact. Being socially destructive, it's the same base instinct that comes from the need for what we would call "romantic love", but since it's only an evolutionary instinct, it only pushes, and doesn't lead directly, so people often lead astray themselves. Although promiscuous immoral sex stems from good biological impulses, it essentially undermines their fulfillment. Exactly on this basis we have to distinguish more conscious attraction from simple internal urges. If you look deeper than you actually look, biology forces us to separate productive sexual relationships and their types (monogamous monoracial families) from incorrect ones (polygamous, interracial, homosexual, etc.).
>>110639
“Word salad” posts like this which sound like they were written by aspiring philosophers are almost always completely detached from reality. Whether something is “maladaptive” has not has no bearing on whether or not it exists… or “should” exist.
“Word salad” posts like this which sound like they were written by aspiring philosophers are almost always completely detached from reality. Whether something is “maladaptive” has not has no bearing on whether or not it exists… or “should” exist.
>>110640
Uh… it isn’t. “I have” is present tense. I “have had” means that one has had something in the past.
Are you the guy I was replying to? You’re saying you still have a girlfriend?
>>110641
So you just imply that the "purpose of life" is precisely sex, and not that sex is a tool for achieving this "purpose"? This is a misrepresentation.
So you just imply that the "purpose of life" is precisely sex, and not that sex is a tool for achieving this "purpose"? This is a misrepresentation.
>>110643
It you want to speak in purely biological terms… yes, the purpose of life is sex. Not only does it continue one’s bloodline, but it also serves as the most pleasurable and fulfilling activity that one may partake in.
It you want to speak in purely biological terms… yes, the purpose of life is sex. Not only does it continue one’s bloodline, but it also serves as the most pleasurable and fulfilling activity that one may partake in.
>>110642
No, I'm an observer. And as I remember, present continuous represents the action that began once and still continues, correct me if I'm wrong.
No, I'm an observer. And as I remember, present continuous represents the action that began once and still continues, correct me if I'm wrong.
>>110647
>Serve as one what
I mean it is only this pleasurable because it's biologically the most needed thing in our lives. For everyone.
>Serve as one what
I mean it is only this pleasurable because it's biologically the most needed thing in our lives. For everyone.
>>110649
Yes. How does that contradict anything I’ve said previously?
Yes. How does that contradict anything I’ve said previously?
>>110650
That does not, right, but the problem is that you're misinterpreting and substituting these things.
That does not, right, but the problem is that you're misinterpreting and substituting these things.
>>110653
Provide an example of what you’re referring to. How am I misinterpreting and substituting things.
Provide an example of what you’re referring to. How am I misinterpreting and substituting things.
File:
1784505316163.jpeg
(203.56 KB, 894x919, IMG_2622.jpeg)
STOP BUMPING THIS YOU ESL FNF PEDOS
>>110658
All of that is just some weird semantic word-game that you are playing with yourself. Whether sex is the goal in-and-of itself or the means of achieving a goal is irrelevant.
This is why I said before that posts like this are always detached from reality… the question of whether or not a dichotomy exists between these two things does not physically translate over to reality… it only serves as a hypothetical though-experiment that can only exists in your mind.
File:
1784505316163.png
(299.31 KB, 600x435, 111569 - SoyBooru.png)
File:
1784505316163.png
(93.90 KB, 498x352, truthnuke.png)
>>110660
Ev&oe it's a discussion that involves at least two Christians which defend morality on biological grounds arguing what is naturally reasonable and what is not reasoning from these very biological grounds.
>>110661
>Whether sex is the goal in-and-of itself or the means of achieving a goal is irrelevant
And why do you think so?
>this dichotomy exists only inside of your head
What a dichotomy? "Romantic love"/"trivial lust"? Whatever you call it, it's just a fact there are bad and good strategies in the "life goal" achievement which is reproduction (or gene preservation through reproducing if more precisely).
Ev&oe it's a discussion that involves at least two Christians which defend morality on biological grounds arguing what is naturally reasonable and what is not reasoning from these very biological grounds.
>>110661
>Whether sex is the goal in-and-of itself or the means of achieving a goal is irrelevant
And why do you think so?
>this dichotomy exists only inside of your head
What a dichotomy? "Romantic love"/"trivial lust"? Whatever you call it, it's just a fact there are bad and good strategies in the "life goal" achievement which is reproduction (or gene preservation through reproducing if more precisely).
>>110671
>And why do you think so?
Explain to me how something like that translates over to, and has a tangible effect on, reality.
>there are bad and good strategies in the "life goal" achievement
I don’t think anyone in the thread ever argued this. I’ve always said that people who are attracted to each other want to have sex with each other.
>>110672
>Explain to me how something like that translates over to, and has a tangible effect on, reality.
Well it's simply helps us in understanding what we actually need to live happier lives and be a successful breed.
>>there are bad and good strategies in the "life goal" achievement
>I don’t think anyone in the thread ever argued this. I’ve always said that people who are attracted to each other want to have sex with each other
Albeit you technically equated things like smash-and-dash (bad strategies) with actual families (good strategies), this is why I got butthurt at you
>Explain to me how something like that translates over to, and has a tangible effect on, reality.
Well it's simply helps us in understanding what we actually need to live happier lives and be a successful breed.
>>there are bad and good strategies in the "life goal" achievement
>I don’t think anyone in the thread ever argued this. I’ve always said that people who are attracted to each other want to have sex with each other
Albeit you technically equated things like smash-and-dash (bad strategies) with actual families (good strategies), this is why I got butthurt at you
File:
1784505316163.webp
(17.59 KB, 512x512, d00d22f2-5ab5-4c4f-959e-a09ca2fa6713.webp)
Btw I won, my opponent uses reddit spaces (they aren't actually) and therefore I'm right. Also the OP also used reddit spacing so my opponent is OP (must be banned).
>>110673
>Well it's simply helps us in understanding what we actually need to live happier lives and be a successful breed.
There’s nothing that needs to be “understood”. People who are horny for each other will fuck… and that fucking will generate babies. People understand this intuitively… they don’t need to read a book or entertain abstract concepts to understand it.
>Albeit you technically equated things like smash-and-dash (bad strategies) with actual families
I didn’t. That is likely a byproduct of you reading through the message too quickly and getting “butthurt” for no reason. I merely said that both of these scenarios were instigated by the same feelings (lust/sexual attraction).
>Well it's simply helps us in understanding what we actually need to live happier lives and be a successful breed.
There’s nothing that needs to be “understood”. People who are horny for each other will fuck… and that fucking will generate babies. People understand this intuitively… they don’t need to read a book or entertain abstract concepts to understand it.
>Albeit you technically equated things like smash-and-dash (bad strategies) with actual families
I didn’t. That is likely a byproduct of you reading through the message too quickly and getting “butthurt” for no reason. I merely said that both of these scenarios were instigated by the same feelings (lust/sexual attraction).
>>110676
To “generate” means “cause to arise or come about”. It’s an appropriate word.
To “generate” means “cause to arise or come about”. It’s an appropriate word.
>>110675
>There’s nothing that needs to be “understood”. People who are horny for each other will fuck… and that fucking will generate babies. People understand this intuitively… they don’t need to read a book or entertain abstract concepts to understand it.
So you think that spiders' strategy for breeding & raising children is effective? Lol. Well it's too subtle, the joke is that spiders bear little spiderinis and then genocide them en-masse.
>You're butthirt for no reason, I'm agreeing with you (allegedly)
Ok Fritzl, turns out my opinion is true (woah)
>There’s nothing that needs to be “understood”. People who are horny for each other will fuck… and that fucking will generate babies. People understand this intuitively… they don’t need to read a book or entertain abstract concepts to understand it.
So you think that spiders' strategy for breeding & raising children is effective? Lol. Well it's too subtle, the joke is that spiders bear little spiderinis and then genocide them en-masse.
>You're butthirt for no reason, I'm agreeing with you (allegedly)
Ok Fritzl, turns out my opinion is true (woah)
>>110678
>So you think that spiders' strategy for breeding & raising children is effective? Lol. Well it's too subtle, the joke is that spiders bear little spiderinis and then genocide them en-masse.
You think you understand more about nature than nature itself… like you have the right to “critique” the way the world is? That is bizarre and nonsensical.
>You're butthirt for no reason, I'm agreeing with you (allegedly)
I guess? You are indeed getting upset for no reason. If you agree that lust/sexual attraction is the promary motivator for male/female interactions… then yes, we are in agreement.
File:
1784505316163.gif
(672.67 KB, 220x124, clapping-nostalgia-critic.gif)
>>110679
Ph, and I should say that the method that spiders rear their babies is indeed effective… as there are literally quadrillions of them on Earth.
Ph, and I should say that the method that spiders rear their babies is indeed effective… as there are literally quadrillions of them on Earth.
File:
1784505316163.png
(90.23 KB, 497x513, koos_smoking.png)
File:
1784505316163.png
(68.51 KB, 333x584, IMG_2614.png)
I hope you two do this tomorrow
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 111 | Views: 5 | Currently viewing: 1