The Zarty

>>4763
>>4764
>>4765
>>4766
leaking

>>>4763 (You)
>>>4764 (You)
>>>4765 (You)
>>>4766 (You)
>leaking

>>4761
Any self respecting right winger supported east european decommunization and destruction of soviet statues, sometimes you just have to erase parts of history that are hostile to your ideas and future

>>4769
tsmt

>>4761
the analogy of historical statues makes no sense for your point, a statue in a public space means you celebrate his legacy, if that legacy is not worth celebrating anymore for whatever reason, the statue should be put in a museum, our museum is /chive/

>>4750
If we do not know the unbiased truth then we can continue to find it. Fake truths are what's taking down today's society, influenced by people's subjective opinions. These are not truths, these are lies that are spread around as a truth.
Humans are ignorant in most cases, but they don't actively seek out the actual truth but are being lead by fake ones, leading them to fight againsts others who are spreading their own fake truths.
Socrates says to be certain in your ignorance, don't try to hide the fact that you know nothing or make up fake truths to cover up the flaws in your ideology. We as a species need to continue learning and changing our perspective about things because if we dwell in those fake truths, it will ultimately cause discourse and havoc.
I'm refering to things with an objective truth, subjective topics are subjective, if we do not know the objective truth then we should admit as such instead of hiding from one's ignorance and continue to work on finding out that truth.

>>4772
but the thread WAS moved to /chive/

>>4772
it isn’t the best analogy i could’ve made, but i wanted to convey how ridiculous i think this situation is. the problem isn’t that they’re removing references him (i’d be fine with that), it’s that the mods have flat out banned the sharing of his art.
a better comparison would be to artists who are also bad people. should people not be allowed to discuss and share Roman Polanski’s films? he raped a teenager after all.
Grim had made and continues to make great drawings which people should be allowed to repost as much as they please.

>PLEEEEEEEASEEEEE DON'T BAN GRIM PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DON'T DO THAT, IT'S ART IS STILL SO GOOD
>EVENDOE THE ONLY ART HE'LL DRAW NOW WILL BE MORE AND MORE 'P
>PLEASE PLEASE PLE-ACKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!

>>4781
We shouldn't give even more fame to such disgusting subhuman, banning of his art was a good choice

>>4781
>yeah, we should totally lock and move his thread, but also allow everyone to repost his art everywhere else
look everyone, an idiot spotted

>>4781
Unironic mossad agent attempting to deplatform us by lobbying mods to allow pedophiles

>>4782
would you niggers please stop depicting 4cucks as hanging mymys?

>>4786
That's GRIMmymy nigga, use this if you wanna depict the average /co/fag
>

>>4785
Maybe it's one of the jannies rebelling against Grim ban and trying to change it by pretending to be an innocent little Zaryan. Zoot can we get early life check on jannies?

>YOU SHOULDN'T USE GRIMJAK BECAUSE IT HURTS MY FEE F-ACKKKK!!!

It's just SNCA at this point. Everyone who didn't join yesterday knows grim is an edgy degenerate (literally drew massa having sex with the beheaded sisters). He did cross a line with his latest piece of "ragebait" (though I still blame it on aguguniggers) but I don't think you can just erase all of his presence from the website like it's literally 1984
>>4788
>doesn't remember misha
jews have run this gay website since the beginning

>>4782
>>EVENDOE THE ONLY ART HE'LL DRAW NOW WILL BE MORE AND MORE 'P
he’s drawn that kind of stuff before, we’ve always ignored it and focused on the good stuff up until now. this mindset that we have to completely disregard him is a new one.
>>4783
Grim is just an anonymous guy on 4chan. he has no online profiles and no ways he could benefit from his work. banning or unbanning his art affects him in no way.
>>4784
i didn’t say i supported locking the thread. i said i was fine with people removing references to him on things such as banners and the Zarty’s PixelPlanet region.

>>4781
I think a reasonable compromise is the zooru. There the drawings he makes that aren't egregious are allowed to be posted there, since it is the case for other artists we don't appreciate and also the the zooru is more of an archive of images than anything. I don't think his drawings have a place on the zarty itself anymore like how we've barely reposted stuff from the other co artists. Yet I doubt the people who reposted his artwork are willing to to so now regardeless.

>'p is ongezellig culture newligster

>this entire thread

>>4792
Zooru shouldn't become an safehaven for pedo's art. Every Grimart should be destroyed or falsified, every post should be rewritten, every picture should be repainted, every thread and filename should be renamed, every date should be altered.

>>4795
This, so much this.

>>4795
also everything worth saving was saved already, tell me why anyone would need to repost grim's art right now

>>4795
>

>>4797
because he’s still making good art
also banning art not because of its content but because of the identity of the artist is ridiculous

>>4795
Too much work, but the reasonable compromise is to remove any new posts with his works, rework the coalie and one of the banners.

>>4799
>the good art in question
>'p rape of agugu

>>4799
>the agugu 'p is good art keep posting him

>>4801
>>4802
i’m talking about his new art that hasn’t been reposted here because of the new rule

>BRO COME ON JUST OVERLOOK THE 'P BRO
>IT'S NOT LIKE I TOTALLY GOON TO THIS TRANNY PEDOPHILE ART DUDE THIS IS LITERALLY RULECUCKING

>>4803
Ask the question, what value does sharing his art here bring, why would we want to see his artwork after what he did?

>>4804
>>IT'S NOT LIKE I TOTALLY GOON TO THIS TRANNY PEDOPHILE ART DUDE THIS IS LITERALLY RULECUCKING
no one is cooming to his art here. if they want to they go to Desuarchive and find all his uncensored art.
>>4805
people still enjoy Roman Polanski’s films.

>>4806
Going with your analogy, would you still enjoy polanski's films if it wasn't a random he raped but a close family member of yours, thats the type situation we are dealing with.

>>4806
>people enjoy films by a jewish pedo therefore we should allow artworks by a 4cuck pedo
Who the fuck is this "argument" supposed to convince?

>>4807
and further would appreciate it if your friends shared a film with you created by the guy who raped your sister suppose, I don't think so.

>>4807
>I have formed a family tier emotional attachment to these characters, no I am not delusional.

>>4808
it’s supposed to convince people who believe art can be separated from the artist.
agian, banning art not because of its content but because of the identity of the artist is ridiculous.

>>4811
Banning someone's art just because he is a pedo is a good and rightful thing to do

>They're FICTIONAL CHARACTERS, it doesn't MATTER what happens to FICTIONAL CHARACTERS
>Anyways I just commissioned more loli po-ACKACKACKSCKACKACKACKACKKK!!!

>>4811
but this isn't reddit

what if i post rodscorpion art would i be banned

>>4815
Probably not, we had a gussy thread and he drew much worse shit

>>4810
yet you bring up the analogy of real rape, I just adjusted it to make it more accurate to the situation, yes we have an emotional attachment to ongezellig that's why we are here and care about this more than just wanting to be any other fotm slop

>>4815
What if you posted a perfectly benign soylita with a lollipop? What do you think will happen?

>>4810
Actual /co/pedo nigger in the log. Kill yourself right now. TRVE zaryans treat the characters akin to family, they are precious

>>4815
>what abo-ACK!
Do you want people to?

>>4817
Not the guy who made the analogy, but that's just retarded lol

>>4821
I don't see how you could be in a community about a dead show, dead meme without some kind of attachment

>>4822
besides it's more than just a show, its a whole community