International Politics
or something
ZWABAG
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 56 | Views: 1 | Currently viewing: 1
File:
1784481351708.jpeg
(10.14 KB, 189x266, images.jpg)
I have gained an interest in racial realism, science, and Eugenics, as well as human evolution and biology, to include why we act the way we do, and if such things are due in part to our race and ethnicity, and if race and ethnicity are tied to our different cultures. My Uni teachers, as well as online sources, give me the same kike spiel of "race is a social construct created as a way to justify unjust hierarchies". While my personal politics tie into my interest in racial science, I want to look at it in an objective, non-morally aligned viewpoint (if possible) in order to appeal to the widest audience. However, I have no idea where to start in my studies. Who should I read? What films/videos should I watch? Should I just start with Darwin and look into his theories? And how can I take a neutral tone with others when discussing my studies? While I have the motivation to study this material, I have no idea where to start. Relevant answers and questions would be greatly appreciated.
File:
1784481351708.pdf
(1.90 MB, A_NEGRO_THE_BEAST_OR_IMAGE_OF_GOD_BOOK.pdf)
>racial realism
Just say racism. Race realism sounds like castrated version of racism.
>human evolution
I can describe you the genetic history of the white race up to the paleolithic FOR FREE!!!!
>Uni teachers support the agenda
Many such cases
>Online sources too
Geg are we going to install a general education program on race science on the Zarty
>I want to look at it in an objective viewpoint
Read boring snca studies and skip the conclusions (not always but you get the idea)
>What films/videos should I watch
Ongezellig. Coco moggs all the other sissies so white race won of zoiets als dat.
>Start with Darwin?
With american polygenists of the 19th century I guess
>How can I take a neutral tone with others? You don't have to if it's not an academic argument. Use the emotional appeal in a discussion, trying to prove to the opponent that it really matters to him. Arguing with whites, never forget to remind them about their whiteness, and so.
>Idk where to start
Snca niche telegram groups would be ok. CI posters are obsessed with anthropology, genetics and science as a whole btw, so lurk moar in their chats and channels, it'd be very useful for you as a start.
<An example of the material I've read
<P.S. skip the schizo parts like... well you'll find them anyway so you'll know what they are like
Just say racism. Race realism sounds like castrated version of racism.
>human evolution
I can describe you the genetic history of the white race up to the paleolithic FOR FREE!!!!
>Uni teachers support the agenda
Many such cases
>Online sources too
Geg are we going to install a general education program on race science on the Zarty
>I want to look at it in an objective viewpoint
Read boring snca studies and skip the conclusions (not always but you get the idea)
>What films/videos should I watch
Ongezellig. Coco moggs all the other sissies so white race won of zoiets als dat.
>Start with Darwin?
With american polygenists of the 19th century I guess
>How can I take a neutral tone with others? You don't have to if it's not an academic argument. Use the emotional appeal in a discussion, trying to prove to the opponent that it really matters to him. Arguing with whites, never forget to remind them about their whiteness, and so.
>Idk where to start
Snca niche telegram groups would be ok. CI posters are obsessed with anthropology, genetics and science as a whole btw, so lurk moar in their chats and channels, it'd be very useful for you as a start.
<An example of the material I've read
<P.S. skip the schizo parts like... well you'll find them anyway so you'll know what they are like
File:
1784481351708.png
(361.24 KB, 512x802, M6og5kLp.png)
Nice pic, I'm gonna post it
>>14477
Do you recommend Types of Mankind: or Ethnological Researches, Based Upon the Ancient Monuments, Paintings, Sculptures, and Crania Of Races by Josiah Clark Nott?
Do you recommend Types of Mankind: or Ethnological Researches, Based Upon the Ancient Monuments, Paintings, Sculptures, and Crania Of Races by Josiah Clark Nott?
>>14485
I think it can be useful but I have never actually read it. Only know that its content is literally my opinion so I assume you won't do a mistake if you'll try to read that. Not guaranteeing you anything, though.
I think it can be useful but I have never actually read it. Only know that its content is literally my opinion so I assume you won't do a mistake if you'll try to read that. Not guaranteeing you anything, though.
>its content is literally my opinion because it's said there that Adam was white and not because I really know what kind of ethnological material is presented in the book
>>14486
That's fine. I encourage you to read it, and we can discuss the contents if you so wish.
That's fine. I encourage you to read it, and we can discuss the contents if you so wish.
>>14475
In my own classes our teacher instead tried to force how we were all heccin' equal and was fretting at me pointing out morphological differences such as the different nasal cavity and shape of the skull and the only rebuttal was
>well yeah but it's just somatic!
which translated was that she didn't have much of an answer
In my own classes our teacher instead tried to force how we were all heccin' equal and was fretting at me pointing out morphological differences such as the different nasal cavity and shape of the skull and the only rebuttal was
>well yeah but it's just somatic!
which translated was that she didn't have much of an answer
>>14489
I discussed it with my sociology prof, and he used the christcuck morals and we were all created in God's image bullshit.
I discussed it with my sociology prof, and he used the christcuck morals and we were all created in God's image bullshit.
>>14491
i don't really like when they do that, i personally study something related to the review and nooooticing of features across similar dead species, it's just our own age of the earth is at the center of the world, Darwin may smite you if you disagree with the Soyience
i don't really like when they do that, i personally study something related to the review and nooooticing of features across similar dead species, it's just our own age of the earth is at the center of the world, Darwin may smite you if you disagree with the Soyience
File:
1784481351708.png
(14.44 KB, 295x191, Screenshot 2025-11-10 11.15.17.png)
>>14492
but isn't Darwin a nerd, doe?
but isn't Darwin a nerd, doe?
>>14492
I pretty much know my class on a personal level, so I have to be careful with what I say. Most of them are fine with saying nigger and shit, but if you ever start trying to get into the science "mumbo jumbo" of it, they begin to stare at you funny. I suppose that's ironic racism for you, so fake. And never say Heil Hitler 14/88, they'll stone you. Not that I've tried, of course.
I pretty much know my class on a personal level, so I have to be careful with what I say. Most of them are fine with saying nigger and shit, but if you ever start trying to get into the science "mumbo jumbo" of it, they begin to stare at you funny. I suppose that's ironic racism for you, so fake. And never say Heil Hitler 14/88, they'll stone you. Not that I've tried, of course.
>>14494
Tsmt. I hate that normies think that racism is so obvious bad that everyone who acts racist is actually "ragebaiting". That's all so tiresome.
Tsmt. I hate that normies think that racism is so obvious bad that everyone who acts racist is actually "ragebaiting". That's all so tiresome.
>>14496
Or something like that. Xhe's a boomer who had life handed to him on a silver platter. Glazes MLK.
Or something like that. Xhe's a boomer who had life handed to him on a silver platter. Glazes MLK.
File:
1784481351708.pdf
(22.45 MB, MeinKampf-en.pdf)
>>14497
Not quite what I meant. Moreso, they see racist reels, and find it funny; some may be radicalized by it, but the normie brain sees everything through a thick fog of irony. Why do you think George Droyd is so popular?
Not quite what I meant. Moreso, they see racist reels, and find it funny; some may be radicalized by it, but the normie brain sees everything through a thick fog of irony. Why do you think George Droyd is so popular?
>>14504
read the German version, It's what I do (cause I learned and speak it.)
read the German version, It's what I do (cause I learned and speak it.)
>>14481
So I decided to ask ChatJewPT about this chart, and this is what xhe said:
>That image is a piece of pseudoscientific propaganda that misrepresents genetics. It compares human population clustering with species-level divergence among canines—an invalid and misleading analogy.
>Here’s why it’s wrong:
>Human PCA clusters don’t equal species boundaries.
>PCA (principal component analysis) shows statistical variation, not biological separation. Humans form loose clusters because of geography and ancestry, but those clusters overlap heavily. Genetic distance between human groups is tiny compared with that between species like wolves and coyotes.
>Species-level genetic distance is orders of magnitude higher.
Humans everywhere share about 99.9% of their DNA with each other. The genetic divergence between humans from Africa and Europe is around 0.1%, while between species like wolves and coyotes it’s about 5–10%—dozens of times larger.
>“Race” ≠ biological subspecies.
No recognized genetic or biological authority (including population geneticists who actually use PCA) classifies human races as subspecies. What PCA really shows is gradients of ancestry, not rigid categories.
>The chart’s bottom section was edited out of context.
The original PCA plots (from legitimate human genomics papers) don’t claim humans are divided into races like “White,” “Black,” etc. They show how genetic variation loosely corresponds to geography.
Is it wrong that I'm starting to doubt the validity of race? There's no way I'm this much of an Amerimutt goy.
>>14514
meds, Race is real, why are you using Chat JewPT, use real, Aryan sources and Research.
meds, Race is real, why are you using Chat JewPT, use real, Aryan sources and Research.
>>14516
But wouldn't both be biased? One is ZOGGED jewbabble, and the other is Bigoted Chudcel Not-see propaganda o algo. I'm unsure of who to trust.
But wouldn't both be biased? One is ZOGGED jewbabble, and the other is Bigoted Chudcel Not-see propaganda o algo. I'm unsure of who to trust.
>>14517
don't trust Jews, that's their point, trust real Aryan science and research.
don't trust Jews, that's their point, trust real Aryan science and research.
>>14517
as Belarussian said, you should join some right wing Telegram groups and ask around . you're gonna need to provide your phone number but that's all . i'm in a few of those and you can definitely trust them for the most part
as Belarussian said, you should join some right wing Telegram groups and ask around . you're gonna need to provide your phone number but that's all . i'm in a few of those and you can definitely trust them for the most part
>>14518
Maybe I need stone-hard, empirical logic. It's difficult to study something that is considered a pseudoscience and hasn't gotten as much research as it should, but I still need a rebuttal for the Jewish ideas of race.
Maybe I need stone-hard, empirical logic. It's difficult to study something that is considered a pseudoscience and hasn't gotten as much research as it should, but I still need a rebuttal for the Jewish ideas of race.
>>14514
Yes, it's plainly wrong, wolves and dogs share 99.9% percent of their genes, yet no one would claim they are the same species simply because the number of shared genes is not a criterion. What matters is what those genes that are different are responsible for, in people the differences are mostly in genes responsible for cognitive development. And course distances in PCA plots in the two first components say nothing about the genetic distances between species in general.
Yes, it's plainly wrong, wolves and dogs share 99.9% percent of their genes, yet no one would claim they are the same species simply because the number of shared genes is not a criterion. What matters is what those genes that are different are responsible for, in people the differences are mostly in genes responsible for cognitive development. And course distances in PCA plots in the two first components say nothing about the genetic distances between species in general.
>>14514
Geg this bot is just lying. Don't ask the AI for anything, it just copypaste whatever shit it finds on the web.
Geg this bot is just lying. Don't ask the AI for anything, it just copypaste whatever shit it finds on the web.
File:
1784481351708.png
(1.26 MB, 1320x2285, ClipboardImage.png)
>>14522
Exactly, to argue with AI means to argue with a redditor.
Exactly, to argue with AI means to argue with a redditor.
>>14523
Arguing with the redditor is worse because his stupidness is genuine
Arguing with the redditor is worse because his stupidness is genuine
File:
1784481351708.png
(220.94 KB, 1300x1231, ClipboardImage.png)
>>14524
When you argue with a redditor, you can at least make his day worse, when you argue with a machine, you just waste time. Knowing there is a seething person on the other side can be entertaining.
When you argue with a redditor, you can at least make his day worse, when you argue with a machine, you just waste time. Knowing there is a seething person on the other side can be entertaining.
File:
1784481351708.png
(57.05 KB, 898x1002, ClipboardImage.png)
>>14528
Stop joking about my caca habits!
Stop joking about my caca habits!
File:
1784481351708.webp
(5.89 KB, 229x255, IMG_2644.webp)
>>14530
Fuck, fuck, fuck where is my proxy vpn
Fuck, fuck, fuck where is my proxy vpn
Depends what do you mean by white
. I dont consider most "white" people as "white" because the only white people are nordic anglo saxon aryan, but I really start to doubt in race and thinking that its all cultural thing
. I dont consider most "white" people as "white" because the only white people are nordic anglo saxon aryan, but I really start to doubt in race and thinking that its all cultural thing
You could look into the HBD question to see how much race actually affects how a person acts compared to culture. Leftoids often say that socioeconomic factors are the main proponent but they ignore how vastly different people in different cultures behave perceive reality and consume information.
I recommend the Kenyan philosopher John Mbiti for his theories on african culture. His main theory could explain why black culture ended up getting dominated by gang culture in America.
I recommend the Kenyan philosopher John Mbiti for his theories on african culture. His main theory could explain why black culture ended up getting dominated by gang culture in America.
there aren't many pure white aryan kangz left like me on this planet
>>14494
I had a good conversation with some of the normies in there who were autonomously saying that immigrants Don't immigrate and actually agreeing with the average talking points I only have to err around the teachers
I had a good conversation with some of the normies in there who were autonomously saying that immigrants Don't immigrate and actually agreeing with the average talking points I only have to err around the teachers
File:
1784481351708.jpeg
(1.09 MB, 800x7600, eugenics1.jpg)
>>14475
infographic
infographic
File:
1784481351708.jpeg
(2.33 MB, 3200x7191, ib1.jpg)
>>14795
but wait there is moar kek
.
.
INFO BLOB MEGA PACK
http://drive.google.com/drive/folders/13gNcyzC7QvfTbXcVSqorj1pZmFb-csP6
google drive easy to use interface
but wait there is moar kek
.
.
INFO BLOB MEGA PACK
http://drive.google.com/drive/folders/13gNcyzC7QvfTbXcVSqorj1pZmFb-csP6
google drive easy to use interface
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 56 | Views: 1 | Currently viewing: 1