Question & Answer
General topics
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 144 | Views: 8 | Currently viewing: 1
>I just greenquoted you, now it's over for you, /pol/cel!
Evendoe I joined the argument not to discuss femcels and so.
>You said that X and Y
Yes I indeedly said these things. You want to clarify the details? I don't know.
- you made an assertion
- prove it
the proof of burden lies with the side making the claim. do i really need to teach you the basics of debate?
It wasn't that women MUST go to the gay clubs, I actually stand against homosexuality and gay clubs including (as if it wasn't obvious). And I actually support some gender segregation (not in the islamic terms).
i have no idea if youre the slavGOD or the other guy but lets go back a few posts
>>da ebil woomeen try to invade our internet gay clubs! Alarm, fellow gaycels, we're in danger of interacting with the other sex!
this implies men are absolutely required to let women in their space and interact with them, but women arent required to let men in their space and interact with them
i ask you why this double standart, since women lose their mind over men trying to join predominantly female spaces
marge, i do know youre not me, im asking which one of the other 2 guys in the thread rn are you because im starting to get really confused who is who
What should I show to you, lmao? The link to the bot? You can find it on your own. I just don't know whether there are analogues of that in the West or not. Anyway, dating apps are still an untermensch thing which has to not exist. It's to that your claims were like "oh no, soooo many men are rejected by women on these apps, we must do something with it!", and it's like ??? well the main problem while discussing this incel stuff is that it's beyond comprehension, it's all more like they just love to hate without a reason.
>Let's just go back a few posts
>the citation
>this implies men are absolutely required to let women in their space and interact with them, but women arent required to let men in their space and interact with them
No, why should it? It only implied that when degenerate communities are ruined it's a good result afterall. I'm not fond of femceldom as well, because it's degenerate whenever men or women want death upon an entire sex (especially inside of their own race, lol). You see that most of the white feminists are obsessed with white men and are okay with nons, while white (or not so white..?) incels are obsessed with white women and are interracial White-Male-Non-Femals fetishists (if not worse).
>What should I show to you, lmao? The link to the bot?
yes, that wouldve been very helpful actually, alas
>You can find it on your own.
i obviously cannot, you said a single word in kyrgyz and expected me to go off it
>soooo many men are rejected by women on these apps,
yes, thats what the stats show
>we must do something with it!
i said nothing of the sort
>I can't find the site with this one kyrgyz word
[VK LINK]
In telegram — [TELEGRAM USERNAME]
Here you go
>so my stats are correct
Irrelevant since dating apps must be perished with their (((creators)))
>I haven't said anything about what to do about that
So it's been just an empty talk all this time? What did you want to prove then? Why incels or related sibculture faggots are so obsessed with snca things like dating apps and so???
youre putting words in my mouth about me somehow saying that men should retaliate against women and genocide the entire sex with a side of racebait
i just said women are hypergamous lmao
im not even going to bother with addressing the latter part of your rely becauss i try to debate you and you keep screeching about jews and race
dont care honestly, besides its impossible to prevent with globalisation and such
>i just said women are hypergamous lmao
It's funny how your own holywar pics, in trying to prove it, fail and prove a completely different thing.
>examplehttps://soyzellig.party/qa/src/1761073643538-2.png
Also, other two graphs were about appearance and how "le ungrateful women" rate men lower than they rate the opposite sex. I really can't comprehend what problem there is about it (as if it was important or notable), and how it's connected to hypergamy...
The greatest danger and the most terrible sin ever. So, in order to avoid it, let's genocide all other races.
>Me saying this
><...> how it's connected to hypergamy…
the 80/20 rule. 80% percent of women go for the top 20% (in terms of sexual market value, i.e face, height, money status) men.
you can't divide 20 by 80 - so the same men date multiple women at once, and vice versa. this is the fault of both men statusmaxxing (having multiple partners is seen as 'alpha') and women resourcemaxxing (leeching off as much money as possible from as many men as possible)
but I love race mixing
>the 80/20 rule.
Not a rule, factually. Your own memes depict it as being a peculiarity of the XXI century. Not that everything else in the reply is wrong and that a lot of people don't live like this nowadays but still. The only cure to this is high morality. Instead of it you seem to propose nothing but embarrassing this awfulness (totally gay decision btw).
Coco mogs her, and so does even Yfke. Also, if you're not racist, and support miscegenation, you're COMMUNIST. So chud yourself or kys instead. It's your choice.
>Your own memes depict it as being a peculiarity of the XXI century.
and what century are we in right now? geg youre talking as if were 100 years into the future and the data is outdated
I only meant that it's the problem of the modern weimar societies. I already mentioned what's to cure this social disease. But you don't listen me since you all are kind of communists who accept and praise race-mixing. This is a serious signal. And how can such persons even come to places like Soyzellig? No idea.
if thats the case you have to undo the 19th amendment, the sexual revolution and civil rights movement. good luck with that
obsessed website brapped and deleted my reply
well, If we consider purifying, then I have an idea
<New International Version (NIV) (for betas)
7 The Lord did not set his affection on you and choose you because you were more numerous than other peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples
(2)and when the Lord your God has delivered them over to you and you have defeated them, then you must destroy them totally.Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy.
(3) Do not intermarry with them. Do not give your daughters to their sons or take their daughters for your sons,
(4) for they will turn your children away from following me to serve other gods, and the Lord’s anger will burn against you and will quickly destroy you.
(5) This is what you are to do to them: Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones, cut down their Asherah poles and burn their idols in the fire.
(6) For you are a people holy to the Lord your God. The Lord your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession.
(7) The Lord did not set his affection on you and choose you because you were more numerous than other peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples
<King James Version (KJV) (For Chads)
(2) And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them:
(3) Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.
(4) For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.
(5) But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire.
(6) For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.
(7) The Lord did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:
(8) But because the Lord loved you, and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the Lord brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.
Yeah the early modern English sounds more germanic and, properly, more english (or anglish, in this regard)
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 144 | Views: 8 | Currently viewing: 1