International Politics
or something
ZWABAG
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 29 | Views: 1 | Currently viewing: 1
File:
1784479781934.jpeg
(209.59 KB, 828x765, IMG_4589.png)
Either implementation or editing of the original premise.
>>7181
It could work in an environment when all people are perfect clones of each other.
It could work in an environment when all people are perfect clones of each other.
>>7181
No. Planned economies are too inefficient compared to market economies.
No. Planned economies are too inefficient compared to market economies.
File:
1784479781934.png
(2.40 MB, 1920x1080, ClipboardImage.png)
Communism works in asiatic countries for a few months, but then it naturally turns back into a natural asiatic system of production or collapses.
>>7183
++
Asians have no individual personality due to low intelligence, innovationness and creativity
++
Asians have no individual personality due to low intelligence, innovationness and creativity
>>7184
Nah it's actually commie bcs asiatics are biologically collectivist and so on
Nah it's actually commie bcs asiatics are biologically collectivist and so on
>>7191
Nah. Their prefrontal cortex is so crass that I have no words to describe this. The only thing they are better than Europeans in it's the temporal lobes, but I could say the only benefit they get from this advantage is tonality in the languages o algo. Also, to understand how much intelligence does anyone have, you need to look at the IQ subtests, not the average results.
Nah. Their prefrontal cortex is so crass that I have no words to describe this. The only thing they are better than Europeans in it's the temporal lobes, but I could say the only benefit they get from this advantage is tonality in the languages o algo. Also, to understand how much intelligence does anyone have, you need to look at the IQ subtests, not the average results.
File:
1784479781934.webm
(1.66 MB, 720x720, 1735081875158.webm)
>you need to look at the IQ subtests
lol
lol
>>7194
But all tests show their intelligence is spatially tilted, not verbally tilted as it is the case with Jews
But all tests show their intelligence is spatially tilted, not verbally tilted as it is the case with Jews
>>7196
It's better to have equally high scores on all subtests than the extremely high only on one of them. Albeit WASPs even mog the NE Asians in both subtests (noboby besides me cares for some reason).
It's better to have equally high scores on all subtests than the extremely high only on one of them. Albeit WASPs even mog the NE Asians in both subtests (noboby besides me cares for some reason).
File:
1784479781934.jpeg
(28.52 KB, 678x391, UK-ethnic-IQ-origin.jpg)
>>7199
>You can't have better scores on subtests and simultaneously have worse composite score
They have the higher score on one subtests and the lower on another, it's simple. I mean, on one subtest they score above 100, on another - below. Average Whites score 100+ on both. And the WASPs score even higher than they do anyway. This way the verdict remains the same, the smartest people on Earth are a part of the White race.
Also, >>7194
<zooru space >>7201
It can mostly indicate the tendencies, but overall, the IQ indicator is quite good.
>You can't have better scores on subtests and simultaneously have worse composite score
They have the higher score on one subtests and the lower on another, it's simple. I mean, on one subtest they score above 100, on another - below. Average Whites score 100+ on both. And the WASPs score even higher than they do anyway. This way the verdict remains the same, the smartest people on Earth are a part of the White race.
Also, >>7194
<zooru space >>7201
It can mostly indicate the tendencies, but overall, the IQ indicator is quite good.
>>7223
I don't know about the neuroscience stuff, but what you say feels wrong simply because when comparing national IQs it is customary to set the white British average to 100 (because Lynn was British), and all data I've seen show that EA have average IQ around 105, that is 1/3 SD higher than the white average. You need to provide me with a source on that.
I don't know about the neuroscience stuff, but what you say feels wrong simply because when comparing national IQs it is customary to set the white British average to 100 (because Lynn was British), and all data I've seen show that EA have average IQ around 105, that is 1/3 SD higher than the white average. You need to provide me with a source on that.
File:
1784479781934-1.gif
(4.50 KB, 416x312, IMG_20250115_235444_464.gif)
File:
1784479781934-2.jpeg
(48.24 KB, 601x425, IMG_20250115_235609_554.jpg)
>>7234
British ≠ WASP bruh.
Also my statement about the WASPs outscore everyone on every aspect of IQ refers to Lynn as well (but am too lazy too find the data by him, so gonna upload other related pics). But, as I remember, the New England White Americans of the known origin would have 110-114 IQ scores (even higher than Jews). It's all I can remember now. Will clarify the point tomorrow though.
British ≠ WASP bruh.
Also my statement about the WASPs outscore everyone on every aspect of IQ refers to Lynn as well (but am too lazy too find the data by him, so gonna upload other related pics). But, as I remember, the New England White Americans of the known origin would have 110-114 IQ scores (even higher than Jews). It's all I can remember now. Will clarify the point tomorrow though.
>>7235
>British ≠ WASP bruh.
I didn't say they are exactly the same, also who do you think they descend from?
>Will clarify the point tomorrow though.
Didn't clarify the point award.
>British ≠ WASP bruh.
I didn't say they are exactly the same, also who do you think they descend from?
>Will clarify the point tomorrow though.
Didn't clarify the point award.
>>7293
>I didn't say they are exactly the same, also who do you think they descend from?
The second ones descend from the first, but it doesn't really matter, WASP are still smarter than the British (because of eugenics albo sztoś).
>Didn't clarify the point award.
I eventually forgot about it, but I think it's not that difficult to open his "Bell Curve" book. However, it's unlikely to change anything in our discussion.
>I didn't say they are exactly the same, also who do you think they descend from?
The second ones descend from the first, but it doesn't really matter, WASP are still smarter than the British (because of eugenics albo sztoś).
>Didn't clarify the point award.
I eventually forgot about it, but I think it's not that difficult to open his "Bell Curve" book. However, it's unlikely to change anything in our discussion.
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 29 | Views: 1 | Currently viewing: 1