[ home ] [ q / qa / zellig / brabant / drenthe ] [ overboard ] [ v ] [ archive / telegram / zelligwiki / club / booru ] [ execution list / pph ] [ Rules / Contacts ] [] [ log in ]

/zellig/ - Ongezellig

IAZ and soft NAZ
Name
Options
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

ZWABAG

File: 1750863266689.png (1.25 MB, 1080x1080, 99174 - SoyBooru.png)

 No.93363

mymy is 15 you sick fucks

 No.93368

File: 1750863344663.png (51.81 KB, 1662x832, GOOOOOOOOOOOOO.png)

agugu is 1

 No.93372

Average zartyfag is 15 as well btw

 No.93398

Honeypot Mossad CIA thread trying to guess your age, fuck off glownigger scum
>>93372
Average age to use the site is above 18 btw

 No.93429

File: 1750867009177.jpg (34.38 KB, 763x537, 1748244822625.jpg)

16 but tsmt
Let me speak my peace: zellig porn no matter what will always be horrible and if you goon to it get some fucking therapy
Already gooning is wrong, but let's dive a bit deeper into this shit
If it's adults gooning to the zellig characters, that's pedophilia unless if it's literally only vera or the parents or something
If it's people the same age as the characters, that's worse, that's literally fucking epi
So it's always either pedophilia or epi
And always well, porn too, porn itself is bad.

 No.93447

File: 1750868099708.gif (16.1 MB, 851x894, 1750519154925a.gif)

>>93429
>
Kill all pedophiles, TPD TGD

 No.93456

>>93429
masturbating to presumably adult characters is not pedophilia. even if the NSFW artists in question explicitly state that they're their canonical age, it's still not pedophilia because 16 is post-pubescent.

 No.93458

>>93456
that's still bad though.

 No.93463

>>93456
I mean if they don't look like kids in the porn trve ig but still borderline and creepy since you know they are 16 while gooning
That's still fucked up shit

 No.93466

>>93456
its fucked up no matter how you put it.

 No.93471

>>93429
gooning is bad either way

 No.93569

gooning is bad either way

 No.93574

so what? nothing in here is sexual

 No.93636

File: 1750891364189.jpg (540.45 KB, 3261x3073, IMG_6989.jpg)

>>93398
no cuz there was a poll loke a year ago I think and most were below 18

 No.93637

>>93458
>fulfilling your sexual needs in the most natural manner that is commonly found in nature while looking at physically mature specimens is bad, because it's just is okay?

 No.93638

>>93636
so what you're saying is they're 1+ year older now?

 No.93639

File: 1750893459927.png (43.58 KB, 721x720, goonerson.png)

>bro jerking off is so natural guys, i just need to be natural and not a heckin' cuckslave o also asi

 No.93642

>>93639
watching and looking at depictions of naughty things real or otherwise is bad.
ejaculating is natural though, there's a reason animals besides humans do it while in captivity, it's just that it's meant to be done with a female.
masturbation isn't a horrible alternative though, as long as your using your imagination, because unless you're crazy there's no reason your imagination should hurt you.

 No.93644

>>93642
I mostly agree, although I was quoting particularly the part about looking at porn, because that's where the real danger lies as pornography is an inherently addictive and corrupting substance that rots people's minds and souls. Reverting to a non porn-induced sexuality, masturbation is no longer excessive and not that harmaful



[Return][Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ q / qa / zellig / brabant / drenthe ] [ overboard ] [ v ] [ archive / telegram / zelligwiki / club / booru ] [ execution list / pph ] [ Rules / Contacts ] [] [ log in ]