No.92036
rape and kill xim
No.92041
>>92033Apop is that oldfag /co/cuck guy who loves to draw zellig back in the early days of Ongezellig. Some are good but most of it are NSFW. But he always draw zellig characters in gooner body proportions, so yeah he's le bad by Zarty standards.
No.92046
>>92033Coal 'artist', period
No.92052
>R-RAPE… AND KILL XIM…
>OH NO… HECKING… NAUGHTY DRAWINGERINOS??? THIS IS JUST… *STARTS BREATHIHG HEAVILY* THE WORST THING EVER…
>*what are your fetishes.png* UM… C-COAL ""ARTIST"", P-PERIOD.
No.92054
>>92052i say all of these things
No.92055
>>92054couldn't FUCKING help himself award
No.92120
>>92033Apop is a product of his time, /co/ and /soy/, he did some iconic stuff, and back then it was easy to ignore the porn, but I think he could change for the better like many people who did here
No.92121
execute him
No.92177
Wait, isn't he brown?
>inbefore "like the average user of the Zarty"
No.92191
A lot of the NSFW stuff is old. The guy is anti-gooner now o algo.
No.92192
>>92191>t. apopThanks for the update 'fonz
No.92193
>>92191He really repented for his past?
No.92197
>>92195I asked, not stated…
No.92206
>>92193He has. Don't ask me how I know, he just has
No.92208
>>92191Apop's redemption arc? Love to see it
No.92211
>>92206>don't ask me how I knowit's der cord, well promises made in cord mean nothing, he has to show he has changed publically and renounce his old ways, because it's still a fact that he very recently made goon slop.
No.92212
>>92211That's what I was saying, but I am sure he'll come around, I don't think he's a bad guy
No.92223
>>92212once a pedophile always a pedophile
No.92224
>>92223Big difference between that and a goonslopmaker
No.92226
>>92223tbh he's drawing them as different from children as possible
No.92228
>>92226it dosent matter dude, its still literally 'p no matter how he draws them
No.92231
>>92228It does though, if he was drawing them as infants or something, that'd be significantly worse than drawing them in the gooner style of big tits and ass.
No.92233
4 gooners above me kys pedos
No.92234
>>92231It's still very bad don't kid ourselves but let's not fall in the
>everything is 'p Pipeline
No.92235
>>92234Nigga im obviously talking about the censored shit, i dont care if he draws them as "adults", its still pedophilia and he should be fucking executed
No.92236
>>92235>he draws them as "adults">its still pedophiliathat's contradictory. drawing adult bodies can never be pedophilic.
No.92238
>>92234yeah obviously it would've been better if he didn't draw it at all. Just pointing out it's better he didn't draw them like how a pedololinigger would.
No.92240
>>92237??? they are 16 you retard, it DOSENT MATTER HOW HE DRAWS THEM
No.92241
>>92240it very much does, if he drew them as grannies, would you still insist on it being pedophilic?
No.92242
>>92240by that same token, if someone draws porn of canonically adult characters with the bodies of toddlers, is that not pedophilic?
No.92243
>>92240age doesn't matter for drawings lil nigga. If it did, then lolicons could get away with "muh hecking thrembillion year old dragon" while drawing the body of a 6 year old. By the way we aren't defending him drawing porn. Yes, it is bad, but to call him a pedo over it takes it a step too far.
No.92245
>>92241i do not know how to answer this because its pretty weird for me to think about
>>92242it is yeah
>>92243how can you not already call him a pedo man i just dont understand, knowing he was fully aware of their ages while drawing that shit is just so disgusting
No.92246
>>92235This userbase is becoming a satire of itself
No.92247
>>92245Their ages do not matter because they are not real. He's drawing them as adults. If you think it's weird because in the show they're only 16 then fine but calling him a pedo over it seems like a stretch.
No.92248
>>92245>I don't care he's a pedo because he just isWhy do you bother arguing then?
No.92249
>>92245>it is yeahthat's a double standard. why does canonical age matter when they're children but not when they're adults?
No.92250
>>92243trvke
how can even age matter in terms of drawings if the age doesn't exist, it's whatever the author said it is, which is irrelevant
No.92252
>>92243trvke
how can even age matter in terms of drawings if the age doesn't exist, it's whatever the author said it is, which is irrelevant
No.92253
>>92252slowest internet award
said it again awatd
No.92256
It's not about their age you niggers, 16 is legal almost everywhere anyway. It's the fact that it's porn which is brimstone and anyone who draws it WILL go to niggerhell
No.92257
>>92256atleast we agree on that
No.92259
>>92194ye, he aint drawin no porn no more afaik.
he is a chill fella.
No.92260
>>92259he still has to properly repent for his past actions he isn't all of a sudden le good now, but if he is willing to be better, I am willing to be merciful.
No.92261
>>92255It’s to avoid dox nigga
No.92262
So what it's the deal? He makes 'p???
No.92263
>>92260You sound extremely self righteous, repentance isn't a public performance to win over your "mercy"
No.92265
>>92033I've talked with em, he's pretty chill ngl
No.92266
>>92263I don't mean to come off as self righteous, but he's still a public figure and if he really did change he'll need to remove the porn from his public accounts and denounce it, otherwise his so called "change" is meaningless and he's still a vantablackgoonnigger.
No.92267
>ppd doubles with another thread talking about porn and child porn
KEK! this is why i love the zarty
No.92268
>>92260I am sure he'll come around, we aren't the absolute arbiters of morality after all, we just guide people towards what is objectively better and see how they fare after that
No.92300
>>92033can you post the one of Coco in the white dress at the top please
No.92309
>>92298Deserved, keep the GEMeenschap clean
No.92312
>>92304>niggerlicious proportionMarge
No.92320
>>92304>awful proportionsHas never seen a woman award
No.92321
File: 1750496168526.png (Spoiler Image, 643.82 KB, 2913x3180, 162 - artist_apop coco dre….png)
>>92300Just for your information, I saved it from the old zooru in october 2024, not directly from his xitter.
No.92349
>>92348Send this on /co/ and watch the seethe
No.92350
>>92348Most sensible chart yeah
No.92351
>>92320xitter reponse
>>92348if you goon to prepubescent children, it's pedophilia, if you don't, it's not
No.92352
>>92348also I shoul've precised that 'taking action' means talking to that person, therefore acknowledging their age, so if you know a flat looking woman is actually an adult its okay to date her or whatever
No.92354
>>92351seems like it fits what the chart says
No.92357
>>92354not really because it uses the term underage which sometimes leads confused xitter users into thinking dating e.g. 17 year olds is pedophilia
No.92361
>>92357obv depends on your relative age, 19 wit 17 is ok, but 30 with 17 is bad because 17 is not as developed mentally, and it can leave a negative mark on their psyche. obv 18 years of age is not some magical barrier when you suddenly become mentally mature, but generally between lets say 16 and 20-something you mature mentally A LOT.
No.92367
>>92361no, it doesn't, we are talking about sexual attraction so the neuromyth of not being developed mentally does not apply and even if it were true, how would the fact of both of people being mentally undeveloped be less dangerous than the situation when only one of them is
No.92368
>>92367because its easier for the developed party to manipulate the other one. also okay, 17 is a questionable range, but for example a big bust 14 yo, its okay to feel sexual attraction because she looks the way she does, but you shouldn't try and date her or bang her because mentally it's still just a child.
No.92370
>>92368in case of 14 year olds it's true, but people are usually fully developed in terms of they mental capabilities at 16
No.92372
Ok so what's the consensus? Can I goon to coco or nah?
No.92373
What is this, a trial to determine if it's ok to be a degenerate or what?
No.92374
Gooning in the big '25 🥀
No.92378
TERRIBLE derailment of the thread. Get back on topic or it's getting locked.
No.92379
>>92378The saviour arrived
No.92380
>>92372kys nigger no u cant
No.92388
>>92380I goon to Coco everyday and there's nothing you can do about it moralfag, try and find me
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) No.92390
>>92388kys 41 year old /co/co pedo
No.92395
thank u
No.92407
>>92348how do you take action on a fictional character
like drawing them?
No.92408
>>92407you can't that's why it says "meds"
No.92409
>>92373i was just trying to find a simple answer but this turned into a race to the bottom geg