No.81980
i doubt it… considering she's right here with me, so she probably doesn't hate men all that much after all but then again….. no. she just doesn't strike as that type, mymy would be more likely though.
No.81981
i don't think so, she seems to be extremely shy and passive, she'd probably be afraid to even post on imageboards or forums.
No.81983
I doubt she'd be interested in politics. Her lack of interest in the history project lends credence to this.
No.81985
Fact-check: false
The more time you spend online the more likely you'll turn out chuddy
Source: myself
No.81990
>>81986there's nothing political about admiring 18's lovely landscapes
No.81992
Would maya browse foid sites like crystal.cafe or lolcow.farm
I think maya would use crystal cafe brcsuse its more nicer i guess
No.81995
>>81992>groomcow.fACKrmsNo
>the 'fePerhaps although she would probably hate how stuck up in the ass the other foids are
No.82000
>>81992everything about maya screams out to me that she deeply cherishes males or something, especially if they're half human half mollusk
No.82007
>>82005>catholicnigresses are NOT sending their best
she should be protestant or lutheran
No.82009
>>82007>Hitler's strongest soldiers convert and recruit niggers nowWhat a geg
No.82013
>>82009always have though, battlefield 1 proves that to be true.
No.82015
>>82014they were also test subjects but that's a whole nother thing
No.82017
>>82014>plaplestinian flagOh nonononononono…
No.82018
>>82017>plaplestinianhell nah bro wants to rape palestinians
No.82091
>>81995She would definitely post in the KF man-hate thread
No.82093
>>82091actually I take that back, it would probably just be the foid section of Kiwifarms in general
No.82094
>>82091>>82093meds, she is not like that.
No.82099
>>82094Ok I guess she probably wouldn't post on those threads now that I think about it buuuuut she would definitely be a lurker. Even on the internet she can't socialize with other people, she can only watch.
No.82110
>>82109niggers and troons lined up to be executed in front of quVVn Maya btw
No.82137
>>81975Maya would be one of those chicks that talk about "brown pride" and "decolonising the schools" while having a White boyfriend
No.82139
>>82137evendoe she was the only one who was not taken aback by the Belgian TND, do not listen to this ilsed psyop
No.82244
>>82109Tracking the posting habit of this 'fee queen
No.82497
>>82109>the reason the women on those spaces hate men is for a lot of the same reasons whites hate browns>they’re violent chimps who can’t control their sexual urges, commit the vast majority of the crime, and have little empathy.Not even remotely true.
Women, on average, are more psychopathic than men and consequently more likely to be the perpetrator in homicide and assault cases when:
1) The 'playing field' is even. See: lesbian couple domestic abuse statistics.
2) They are in a dominant position relative to their victim. See:
Juana Barraza, professional wrestler who killed 42-48 victims (16 confirmed, 30+ suspected) all of which were elderly women, by entering their houses by pretending to be a nurse or social worker, and strangling them with objects she found inside their houses, specifially cords and stockings.
Dagmar Overbye, who killed 25 children including one of her own through drowning, strangulation and burning alive.
Jane Toppan, nurse who confessed to killing 31 patients (12 confirmed, 100+ suspected) by overdosing them on morphine. She confessed to committing the murders in order to satisfy her sexual fetish and "to have killed more people -helpless people- than any other man or woman who ever lived"
Miyuki Ishikawa, midwife who killed 103~ newborns (was indicted for 27 but sentenced for 5, reportedly as high as 87 in police investigation) through criminal negligence. It's important to note that other midwives were complicit in her murders, none of which were ever charged for aiding/abetting (she was apprehended only after police discovered the corpses of newborns), and that she was sentenced to eight years, which was halved to four in an appeal. Also see: Women-are-wonderful effect (phenomenon of women receiving lesser crimimal charges)
Beverley Allitt, nurse who murdered four children by overdosing them on insulin.
3) They are in possession of weapons. See: Aileen Wuornos, serial killer who shot 7 men to death with her defense being that they tried to rape her; she later confessed to willingly having intercourse with each victim for pay.
>"I killed those men, robbed them as cold as ice. And I'd do it again, too.">"There's no chance in keeping me alive or anything, because I'd kill again. I have hate crawling through my system." -Aileen Wuornos'Men are more violent than women' is a blatantly false take on a complex evolutionary issue, propagated mainly by Jewish scholars. Sigmund Freud is a rare exception to this, read his 'penis envy' theory in detail (to summarise: he attempts to explain how women are just as, if not more violent than men; they only not have the natural means to realize their violence through action).
No.82498
>>82497I know no one is going to read this but someone has to say the truth.
No.82503
>>82497Dunno man, there are way more serial killer guys and such. I blame soyciety for this, due to them, over the past 60 years, ignoring and neglecting men. Its like the nigger proverb about man burn down village for warmth o algo.
No.82509
>>824971) there is more man on man violence than woman on woman violence
2) men commit the vast majority of animal abuse, child sexual abuse, and elder abuse. men do not have anymore of an advantage over the victims of these crimes than women, yet they’re still significantly more likely to commit them.
3) even when accounting for the sex gap in weapon ownership, men are still more likely to kill with weapons. if what you’re saying is true, you’d expect there to be more female mass shooters.
you’re mostly just pointing fingers and saying “see, women can be just as evil”. the fact that female serial killers exist means nothing. this is the equivalent of when Xitter users bring up random white criminals whenever confronted with crime statistics. no one is saying that whites never commit crimes ever, they argue that they’re less likely to.
also, i don’t genuinely believe what i said in
>>82109 , i was explaining why these women hate men. i probably should’ve said “they believe”.
No.82514
>>82503>>82509you're both retarded stfu lmao
No.82518
now add abortions to the calculation
No.82521
>>82518Still crazy how fucked up western society is that it allows killing of its own children
No.82527
>>82521You WILL sacrifice your own child to Moloch and you WILL be happy
No.82923
>>82509I wasn't doing whataboutism per se, just giving some notable examples.
No.82973
>>81983She's a privilidged first worlder that doesnt have to face the realities of class society so she's most likely some kind of liberal. Probably socially progressive given hee hobbies and sex.
No.82974
>>82973I love being a privileged first worlder
No.82981
>>82521Youre technically killing millions of childrrn every once in a while by not having sex as sperm eventually gets rrabsorbed by the body.
Society has to draw the line between human and clump of cells somewhere, so why not have it be somewhere useful that increases economic attainment and reduces childbirth mortality etc.
Fetuses arent even conscious in the time where they are allowed to be qborted so whats the difference between them and a sperm cell.
One is just more human shaped.
No.82983
>>82974Most privilidged first worlders eventually have to get a job and first world economies are getting shittier and more unsustainable. Housing crisises, economic inequality etc,
I said doesnt have to face realities of class spciety bcuz shes a student and lives in a well off household.
Hopefully these countries get poorer so something happens.
No.82984
>>82983I do have a job
>Housing crisisesNothingburger, boomers are dying off
>economic inequalityNothingburger, equality is impossible without slavery anyway
>Hopefully these countries get poorer so something happens.Nah, the rich will get richer and the brown poorer
No.82985
>>82981>Society has to draw the line between human and clump of cells somewhereobjectively false
No.82987
>>82984The hosuing crisis isnt about overpopulation, it is landowners artificially jacking up prices by buying housing en masse. We have more than enough housing, it just isnt affordable. Most people will never be able to own a home. This is a huge change.
Economic inequality has deepened and is currently one of the main friction points. It isnt so ething to be ignored. The average americans wage isnt increasing with inflation. As business owners try and find more and more ways to increase profits, life will get worse, and government repression of labor will deepen.
No.82994
The American golden age has ended. Now history can move again. Whether you like it or not.
No.82999
>>82987>The hosuing crisisAllow people to build more, and the "problem" will solve itself.
>Economic inequalityA problem only for people willing to believe it's a problem. Just don't be motivated by hate.
>The average americans wage isnt increasing with inflationIt doesn't have to and the problem is with artificial inflation itself. Adjust your expectations to reality.
>As business owners try and find more and more ways to increase profits, life will get worse, and government repression of labor will deepen.Leftist understanding of economics will never stop being funny. Also non sequitur.
>Everyone is a "clump of cells". It is up to society to determine when this clump of cells gains rights.That's because rights are a purely artificial creation, not because we can't tell what is a human and what isn't.
No.83008
>>82999What? Obviously landowner lobbyists wont allow people to just build their own houses. You have a naive view of the world.
It isnt a problem of "hatred but self interest, the capitalists and landowners pursue their self interest mercilessly. Lobbying the government and attempting to enslave us. zThe only logical step is to unite as a class and fight for our own self interest. Anything else is super cucked,
Also of course rights are artificial. That just further proves my point.
No.83013
>>83008"Obviously" only for conspiracy theorists implying there is a landowner cabal that never ever competes within itself and no one will ever defect and actually start using his land to provide what there is demand for. You seem quite limited in your understanding of the world and people.
>Lobbying the government and attempting to enslave usThis is where the problem is. Armed people that will kill you if you don't give them your money – the government. But as long as there is democracy there is a chance things will get better, Argentina being the proof.
>Also of course rights are artificial. That just further proves my point.No, it just proves you don't understand the distinction between "ought" and "is", rights belonging to the former.
No.83015
brabant is down the hall to the left
No.83016
>>83015allow me to bait the baiter nigga
No.83017
>>83013Lol. Its not a conspiracy to recognize that lobbying exists. Landowners almost never compete against eachother in this matter bcuz they have shared interests. Of course capitalists of different types might have diverging interests.
It is a commonly recognized fact that legislation is only passed as long as it is in the interest of the capitalist class. We live in a capitalist society and our "democracy" is democracy for only the bourgeoisie.
https://act.represent.us/sign/problempoll-fbaWhy wouldnt the capitalists use their massive resorces to influence government, buy out media etc? Those that dont get outcompeted by those who do, so its inevitable.
No.83023
Most dimwitted political "discourse" taking place itt
No.89562
>>82109poor hygiene can also be added to the list
impulsiveness too
No.91999
>>82981>>82990all ethical arguments against early abortions boil down to semantics. when people say "life begins at conception" they're exploiting the connotation of the word "life" to make it seem like biologists are saying "a fertilized egg is a person deserving of rights". what biologists are really saying is "a fertilized egg happens to be meet the criteria for what we consider a life form". the only reason life begins at conception is because we decided that it does. ethics are based on phenomenon in the natural world and the natural world is not affected by our subjective classifications describing it.
i believe a sensible point at which a clump of cells becomes a person is when sentience emerges. you don't even have to contradict the Bible to believe this as there is no line in it which states that a soul is created when two gametes merge.
No.92003
>>81975yes she would. lots of foids despise men simply because they can't get chad to commit.
No.92004
>>91999>bro just throw the baby off the cliff it doesn't even know it's alive>bro the Bible doesn't specify that the soul is created at conception therefore it isn't, just abort your child broTake a rope and wrap it around your neck, you're literally too stupid to be alive
No.92005
>>91999>the only reason life begins at conception is because we decided that it doesgenuinely one of the most retarded sentences I've seen in my life
No.92009
>>91999There's a lot of niggas out here thinking that people are aborting their child after like 8-9 months inside when most abortions happen only a few months after.
Those same niggas call themselves "pro-life" and then they'll be arguing against universal lunch for school children.
No.92011
File: 1750384740401.jpg (Spoiler Image, 203.69 KB, 1080x1065, Screenshot_2025-06-20-08-5….jpg)
>>82985You think this thing could be considered a child and a human baby?
No.92015
>>92011you are trying to act like a smug soyjak while lacking the brainpower and vocabulary required to do that correctly, please stop embarrassing yourself
No.92018
>>92011what a fucking retard
No.92019
>>92011>dolphin embryokek
No.92020
>>92016That's not a human baby saar that's a dolphin embryo
No.92021
>>92004you purposely misrepresenting what i said isn't an argument.
>>92005 we decided what a life form is and that subjective definition is what led us to consider fertilized eggs life. again, this is semantics and it shouldn't influence your moral code. if aliens exist it's safe to say they'd have different classification systems. do you think aliens would have moral consideration for fertilized eggs? the answer is almost certainly no because, again, this all boils down to semantics.
>>92005i specified EARLY abortions.
No.92022
>>92021i meant to tag
>>92009 at that last part, sorry
No.92026
>>92025That's not TRUE saar why are you LYING that's WRONG, you are believing LIES SAAR!!!
No.92027
>eve&doe she drools over thinking about tall Aryan chads like all foids because foids are inherently evil or something
No.92030
>>92004>>92005>>92021>>92022i would like to further add that we did not DISCOVER what qualifies as life, we DECIDED what qualifies as life, which is why we don't consider viruses life. consider this, if biologists simply created a new word to refer to biological life then this debate about the ethics of aborting non-sentient matter wouldn't exist because, once again, all ethical arguments against early abortions boil down to semantics.
No.92039
i can pretty much summarize all of this by saying "something's status as life is not what determines if it warrants ethical consideration. possession of sentience is what determines if something warrants ethical consideration."
No.92050
in my opinion, abortion should only ever be used as a form of euthanasia.
if you know for a fact your baby is going to live a fucking horrible life because of an incurable disease or deformation, i think it's justified to end their suffering right then and there.
No.92051
>>92050this is true, but notice how people supporting euthanasia don't pretend some suffering people are not alive or not people, trying to justify abortion by redefining crucial terms belongs to not even wrong category, it's a failure to understand the is-ought distinction
No.92053
>>92051Us women like to kill our babies lol
No.92057
>>92056
this is really stupid.
a tree can literally never become sentient, in comparison the zygote can.
what are you talking about?
No.92058
>>92056
>all ethical arguments against early abortions boil down to semantics
semantics is about meaning of words
>ethics are based on phenomenon in the natural world and the natural world is not affected by our subjective classifications describing it.
and this is naturalistic fallacy
No.92063
>>92053women who kill their babies for no actual reason just hurt their reproductive success which they personally may be fine with, but will eventually remove such preferences out of the gene pool
No.92069
>>92063it's a taught thing.
women are encouraged to be entitled and immature nowadays.
No.92073
>>92057preventing the existence of sentience is not killing. saying aborting a zygote is murder because it prevents sentience from eventually existing is like saying wearing a condom is murder because it prevents sentience from eventually existing.
>>92058>semantics is about meaning of wordsyes, i know.
>and this is naturalistic fallacyhow so? i'm saying that ethics should transcend language. people against early abortions use the argument "life begins at conception" despite life being nothing more than a subjective classification. it'd be like saying sponges deserve ethical consideration because they're animals. you wouldn't brutalize a hagfish, so you wouldn't brutalize a sponge either, right?
No.92075
why do you niggers want disgenic subhumans to reproduce so much? if you want to keep the fertility rate up it should be through polygyny by a select few.
No.92076
>>92073meds, i didn't say it was murder.
i was just saying a zygote is not the same as a tree.
No.99043
>>91999>when people say "life begins at conception" they're exploiting the connotation of the word "life" to make it seem like biologists are saying "a fertilized egg is a person deserving of rights"this conflation of layman definitions with rigorous, scientific definitions is one of the most common symptoms of science illiteracy.
"that's just a theory, not hard science!"
"dark energy? dark matter? that sounds like some mystical stuff!"
"the big bang must've literally been an explosion because it has "bang" in its name!"
"the Cambrian explosion must've happened so fast, just like how an explosion happens fast!"
"biologists say life begins at conception, that means a person is created a conception!"
this is responsible for basically the entire abortion debate. the same way people believe dark matter is a mystical phenomenon because they associate the word "black" with black magic witchcraft, anti-choice people believe that a life-form is automatically a person because they associate the word "life" with sentient beings.
if black matter was referred to as "non-baryonic matter", no one would think it is mystical, and if biologists said "biota begins at conception" instead of "life beings at conception ", no one would be fighting for the rights of zygotes.
No.99044
>>99042
This is the Dutch Tranime with Soyjaks website sir
No.99045
>>99043*they associate the word "dark" with black magic witchcraft
No.99046
i called it black matter instead of dark matter, sorry
No.99066
>>99043>big science words make big impact on me therefore they do on everyone elsethank you for this unique (not really) insight into a redditor's mind
No.99095
>>99066>big science wordswhat does that have to do with anything? people aren't confused because the words are too big, they're confused because they're conflating the common definitions with the scientific ones.
No.99171
Maya seems like the kind of foid to have sex with her dog
No.99172
>>91999I think abortion is bad because women want it
No.99173
>>82990Women shouldn't have rights because they're a clump of cells
No.99174
>>82521I think child sacrifice to moloch had way more sovl
No.99175
>>82109The foid that types this definitely got penetrated by her dog at least once
No.99176
>>99171ev&oe that would be coco
No.99178
>>99176Mayafail projection
No.99179
>>82990We're all a clump of cells on a spinning ball floating through space so nothing hecking matters but don't you ever say the n word!
No.99180
>>82521I heard that child sacrifice was common in ancient times because it gave people magic powers o algo
No.99181
>>99180now it gives women a magic power to evade responsibility
No.99186
>>99173I believe this unironically
No.99209
>>99198Nigga go back to yt shorts
No.99210
Mr dweller infiltrated this website it seems
No.99218
Mr Dweller VVON
No.105586
>>99043it's interesting how you never see anti-abortion activists attempt to define the word "life", despite "life begins at conception" being their central argument.
No.105587
>>105586Life is defined biologically as something which meets these criteria:
> cellular order>sensitivity or response to the environment>reproduction>growth and development>regulation>homeostasis>energy processingAll of these are met by a fetus
>in b4 no reproductionThe cells of fetae reproduce, so they do meet this classification. Fetae are factually alive, but that’s a separate question from whether they have personhood, and thus rights.
No.105596
>>105587exactly, and if you asked them why we should have ethical consideration for matter which meets this criteria, they're probably respond with a circular explanation like "because it's life". anti-abortion commentators purposely exploit the connotation of the word "life" to their predominantly religious viewers to make it sound like scientists are saying souls are created at conception.
imagine if vegan activists began arguing that we shouldn't hurt sea sponges because "science confirms they're animals". that may seem like a reasonable argument for someone who doesn't know what animals are because they likely think the word "animal " is a synonym for sentient creatures, the same way the religious right thinks of souls when they hear the word "life".
No.105599
>>105596Scientists don’t say anything about souls because even by religious understanding they’re immaterial and so outside of the scope of science. But if you bring stuff like souls into the debate you’re entering the realm of religious morality. That’s considered objective by believers, and best challenged with scripture rather than vague semantics.
If you (fourth person, not YOU you) start from a point of view”I don’t care about religion so no one else should” you’ll just talk past people with different axioms.
No.105600
>>105596I swear there has to be a secret foid on the Zarty echoing radfem talking points in words words words paragraphs for the past few months
PLEASE TELL US YOU'RE THE FEMALE ZARYAN!!! No.105602
>>105601I have gathered top WEF funded soyentists and they have caculated in a snopes approved peer reviewed study that there will be exactly one female Zaryan within the Zarty's entire history, and my Foid Detector TM has captured a foid signature lurking on this very thread… it has to be the one. Do you know what kind of discovery that would make? I would be the most revered man in soyentific history right along with Dr Soyberg and Fauci ximself…