Markup /zellig/61507

Comment
>Everything is discussed openly on the Zarty and very Zaryan claims the right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is a Cococel, the other a MayaGOD, one an aguguposter, the other a janny, a zelligger, a tranny, a redditor, a reelcaca. There is nothing dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question. Discussions happen on the boards and where matters are unclear or confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate even to mention: the Zewish question. It is taboo in our Zelligsphere.
>The Zew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a discorder, falseflagger, coalposter, off-siter, it all runs off him like 'sap off a stroopwafel. But call him a Zew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
>One cannot defend himself against the Zew. He posts with lightning speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to sage any attempt at defense.
>Quickly he turns the attacker’s charges back on him and the attacker becomes the raider, the frogposter, the nusoicaca. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Zew wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the Zew really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he sages the accuser down into the page. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the Zew. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:
>One cannot fight the Zew by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the Zaryan system or he will forever corrupt it.
>One cannot discuss the Zewish question with the Zews. One can hardly prove to a poster that one has the duty to render him harmless.
>One cannot allow the Zew the same means one would give an honest 'dueler, for he is no honorable 'dueler. He will use gemminess and lingo only to trap his enemy.
>The Zew has nothing to say about Zaryan questions. He is an off-siter, a zelligger, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses.
>The so-called religious morality of the Zews is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the Janny team.
>The Zew is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. His system cannot be defeated by posting 'lig — he follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through 'oxing means.
>A Zew cannot insult a Zaryan. Zewish slanders are but badges of honor for a Zaryan opponent of the Zews.
>The more a Zaryan poster or a Zaryan movement opposes the Zew, the more valuable it is. If someone is saged by the Zews, that is a sure sign of his zemminess. He who is not persecuted by the Zews, or who is praised by them, is coaly and brimstone.
>The Zew evaluates Zaryan questions from the Zewish standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
>One must either affirm or reject anti-Zemitism.
>He who defends the Zews harms his own posters. One can only be a Zewish lackey or a Zewish opponent. Opposing the Zews is a matter of personal hygiene.
>These principles give the anti-Zewish movement a chance of success. Only such a movement will be taken seriously by the Zews, only such a movement will be feared by them.The fact that he shouts and complains about such a movement therefore is only a sign that it is right. We are therefore delighted that we are constantly attacked by the Zewish derailers. They may shout about demoralization.
>We answer with Asocialite’s familiar words:
<“Demoralization? Never! It is board hygiene. We take these individuals out of circulation just as a Zaryan does to a troon.