Markup /zellig/31019

Comment
>>31017
>Evendoe it's a gem.
Editing pacifiers for the 800th time is a gem alr
>It's not, as it has nothing to do with pedophilia, which is a sexual attraction to children. There is nothing sexual about those images, and if you think there is, it's you who is a pedo. "Dogwhistle" is troon language.
Geg, projection. Also it is linked with pedophilia
>No, it's obviously something different and Doll as everyone well knows hates zellig.
You missed the point, cacajaks started (almost) as a harmless joke, that devolved pretty quickly into age larp (see /caca/). Agugus are the same thing
>It has nothing in common with ABDL, which is about adult people dressing in diapers. No one does it here.
Who is editing 16 years old into sucking on pacifiers and wearing baby clothes again?
>Guilt by (false) association.
See the dogwhistle section, it may not be weird to you, but it acts as a vector for worse people