Markup /zellig/20673

Comment
>>20672
>widespread usage and consensus
Set the benchmark for how widespread that usage ought to be. If this site, which encompasses a considerable part of the Ongezellig community, uses zellig to refer to the show, is that not sufficient consensus? Or do you want to involve the whole population when a new term is used by the scientific community, too?
>official recognition
I really do not understand why this should be the case. As the English language, for example, evolved into its modern form, the king did not publish a book on what words were real and what words were not.
>>20671
>and why is it important?
This question has yet gone unanswered. What harm would come of using fake words? Why is the line between a word and a set of characters without meaning so important to determine and keep?