Markup /zellig/20650

Comment
>>20645
>If a word can at once be real and not real
Every language has a collection of words in it's vocabulary. The fact that one language has a word while the other doesn't isn't proof of Quantum uncertainty. We use words legitimate to a language we are currently speaking. You don't mix in foreign words unless they're a name of a dish or a piece of media or some other thing that need be denoted in said foreign language, in this case we burrow words. When speaking a language you use words of said language, and using random words from random languages is like speaking giberish, as these aren't words belonging to said language and thus are in said language not actual words.
>As it now is, words may move from not being a real word to being a real word. As such, henceforth, zellig ceases being gibberish and becomes a real word.
The fact that words and names are invented and given doesn't mean any word or name can be proclaimed legitimate by the nature of naming things. zellig is still not an actual English (or dutch) word, neither is gyatt, niether is blud, it's gibberish internet lingo. You wouldn't use it in a dissertation, you wouldn't use it in a newspaper, you wouldn't find it in a dictionary. It's not recognized as an English word, it's IB/internet lingo, the same way that "desu" is 4chan gibberish, not a real word (unless you're speaking japanese). Again, the only way you could quantify internet gibberish as words is by making the category arbitrary (and as such useless), your objective is self defeating.