[
Home
/
Overboard
/
Stats
]
[
g
]
[
calm
/
brabant
/
drenthe
/
q
/
qa
/
zellig
]
[
booru
/
wiki
]
[
v
]
[
Rules
/
Contacts
]
[
Search
]
🔍
[
Register
/
Settings
/
Log in
]
Markup /qa/31318
Comment
The selfish little faggots can read the cuckGPT summary Here are the main points from the document, stripped of most of the drama, jokes, and side comments: Why the author says they were removed The author was removed from a staff/admin position after objecting to the site's characterization of pony pornography as "bestiality." They say they were not defending pony porn itself, but disagreed with the label because they felt it implied they were a zoophile. They also requested booru admin privileges around the same time, which they say had been offered to them before. They claim the situation was largely a misunderstanding that escalated internally. Claims about site administration The site's owner ("Quote") is described as relatively uninvolved in day-to-day management. Most operational decisions are allegedly handled by other administrators and staff. The author claims several staff members operated anonymous or alternate identities on the site. The document contains numerous allegations about staff politics, internal conflicts, favoritism, and personal disputes. Site culture and moderation The author claims staff members deliberately promoted certain memes, spam, and in-jokes to influence site culture and discourage specific groups of users. They allege staff sometimes coordinated actions against rival communities ("splinters"), including disruptive behavior intended to undermine them. They describe a culture of encouraging drama and maintaining strong in-group identities among moderators and staff. Future plans for the site (according to the author) The most significant claim in the document is that: The imageboard is intended to eventually be shut down. The wiki would remain as a permanent archive. The booru would be transformed into a more generic social-media platform rather than remaining focused on its current niche. The author says this transition is already underway and cites the addition of new content categories as evidence. Technical and organizational claims The "nusoi" imageboard engine is described as being stuck in development for a long time. The booru is claimed to have been largely built with AI-assisted coding. The site reportedly earns enough to cover server costs, but not much beyond that. The author claims no meaningful staff salaries were ever implemented. Other notable assertions ROOT is allegedly still involved behind the scenes. Froot is described as having completely left the project. The author alleges previous botting, DDoS activity, and monitoring of rival communities by site staff, though presents no evidence in the document itself. The author claims underage users have historically been common on the site, including among staff, though ages were allegedly not formally verified. The author's self-assessment They deny rumors that they are a zoophile. They admit they can be impulsive and unwilling to back down during conflicts. They say they never took the site particularly seriously and mainly participated because they found it entertaining. Their stated goal is to share what they know rather than seek sympathy. Overall takeaway This is essentially an insider-style grievance and whistleblower post from a former staff member. Most of the document consists of: Explaining why they believe they were removed. Describing internal staff dynamics and conflicts. Making allegations about moderation practices and administration. Claiming the site's long-term plan is to move away from its current imageboard model and eventually phase it out. Many of the claims are personal allegations and assertions that are not independently verified within the document itself.
