Markup /q/5022

Comment
>>4628
If we're going by Dutch standard, Cinecheck, the real "artistic sex" such as in R-rated films and full frontal, genital-inclusive "artistic nudity" is 16+ and outright pornography is 18. As we allow mild gore, which falls between permission at 12 and 16, It would be safe to maintain the 18 standard. Depending on the local laws of the server hoster, I wouldn't be opposed to a drop to 16 so as to be more reflective of the work's background and intended audience. A minimum age of 20 is only strictly used in Bahrain at 21, and I doubt most of our users or servers are in Bahrain.
>>4641
As pointed out almost 4 months ago, there were and still are too many ESLeralds. Generally, you don't want semicolons in lists. You aren't coding, and these are not full sentences. Likewise, full stops are to be avoided for this reason.
>No NSFW or sexual content
Cut "too" in the first point or change it to "this includes posts without attachments". The second point should be "mild drawn gore is allowed".
>/q/ - requests and questions about the Zarty and associated websites
There's ambiguity here. "Associated websites" may mean sites which are also administrated by the Zarty's admin or sites within the Soysphere.
>/qa/ - random content not belonging in the other boards
"content which does not belong on other boards" is better. The content isn't in the boards like a container, it is on them like a surface. "Random" is superfluous.
>/zellig/ - IAZ and the zellig community;
Zellig should be capitalized. It's standard for board titles to be capitalized while their shorthands are lowercase.
>/brabant/ - /qa/ but with flags
This conflict's with /brabant/'s presentation. When I click on /brabant/, it tells me it is for "International Politics or something". "international politics and events" may be better, given the format so far.
>No hostile activity
This is an ESLerald, and the comma-parsed list attached to it would be better off as a list as show in the first two items. "No activity antagonistic to the Zarty or its users" then the bulleted list would be better.
>No degeneracy, including, but not limited to
This misses the mark. Your examples of it are split between promotion and engagement. It would be better to say "No engagement in, promotion of, or association with degeneracy including but not limited to" then a bulleted list. Your current sole example is sexual deviancy, but I've seen bans for Satanism, which I think falls under this rule and could be an example.
>No ban evasion
This should include a clause for clarity regarding VPNs.
>No doxxing
"Doxxing" should be defined with the legal definitions of the US and country of the server hoster.
>No illegal content
"Illegal content" should be defined as that which would violate US federal law and that of the country of the server hoster.
>No outside drama
This requires some explanation as it may already fall under Rule 3 and may, if /q/ is also for the Soysphere, include drama related to the Soysphere. Is "outside" off-site or off-sphere?