Markup /brabant/12665

Comment
>>12663
>We only find their admixtures amongst the neighbouring peoples, because we don't have any Israelite sample, only the Canaanite ones.
So no artifacts, no Unmixed samples, no proof of CWC settlement, nothing?? seems like my explanation is more sound and pairs up with occams razor.
this can be explained by greco-roman settlers, slave trade of european wowen (who were especially valuable in slave markets) and indo-iranic admixture. you can see this with how "Dinka" (niggers) had a presence there too which can only be really explained by a continual slave trade.
>But The increasing proportion of Indo-European (WSH and even WHG, which is also very important) genetics in the blood of various Canaanite (and other) tribes tells us of their continuous presence until our era (Anno Domini), when the mass mixing throughout the Roman Empire turned not only all of the province of Judea brown
there would have probally been mixing there already at increased levels if true. even with extensive segregation african-americans and opposition to mixing they still have like 21% Euro ancestry. staying unmixed for literally one and a half thousand years is completely impossible unless you're some kind of insane extreme ethno-chauvinistic group like the jews.
>This is also very clearly visible when comparing admixtures by epochas. The correlations between these core european admixtures (ANF, WHG, WSH) tell us that the population that introduced all these into the genomes of the neighboring peoples consisted purely of these components. It's very similar to the situation in India and Iran, because we only know sintashians, andronovians and others migrated there due to their linguistic legacy. No actual samples were found in those regions.
actual samples were found in these regions though. it's just that jeets try to hide it and conceal these
https://x.com/Tom_Rowsell/status/1907333046304424038
https://x.com/oxyyonx/status/1907425619358409074
>If we can find sintashians in India, then ok, provide some examples of this, I would like it.
lol
>Because Abraham and his offspring adopted local material culture and even language (yet before Abraham even was born though).
cultures historically NEVER do this for obvious reasons unless they were dominated and enslaved and forced to take another culture like niggers. once again if CWC settled in the levant we would see archeological proof and samples and it would be noticed by archeologists, there is stuff that we just don't find from graves like certain tools and pots that shows a link to a culture that we would find it CWC settled there. this is unreasonable and retarded, occams razor.