Markup /brabant/12523

Comment
>>12508
>i was not praising communism you fucking retard, the point i was trying to make is that just becuase christ hated le jews didn't mean he was one or associated with them
He hated (((them))) for their ancestry and origin, though. He never considered (((them))) as "sheep of Israel". Get real uh.
>he simply hated them for being a different branch of judaism
Modern Judaism is from the Pharisees. The Pharisees were Edomites that desecrated the Scriptures and added their Idumean oral traditions to the canon. The real Old-Testament religion wasn't "(((judaism)))", because it's actually a non-Israelite, Canaanite bastardization of the first.
>kikes love to infight amongst petty shit amongst themselves
Irrelevant whataboutism
>You're the only person who hasnt realized this and you are either purposefuly misinterpreting it in bad faith (probally the most likely option since christ trannies basically argue in the same dishonest shitty manner as leftist) or are just being retarded
No it's just you being vile from your heart. I can't change it. You're still circumcised in the heart anyway (Romans 3), cope with this, heathen.
>So he was jewish.
Jews stole their identity from their conquerors just like modern Iranians call themselves "Aryan". It's a pretty usual scenario when the conquered replace the conquerors and steal their identity, idk why pagans hate when anyone applies it to the Bible.
>even ashkenazis have 40-60% israelite middle easterner or whatever
It's canaanite admixture. Israelites weren't related to them. They were migrants from Japhetic Europe (Genesis 9), and if more precisely, from the CWC.
 >jesus was a genetically speaking a brown mizrahi jew 
Never happened. His reconstructions based on the Turin Shroud show he was a northern European phenotypically. And most likely higher than you (≈182 cm).
>now most closely related to abraps in modern day palestine 
Yeah bcuz they're genetically canaanite. You're making me sick by confusing the Canaanites and the Israelites.
>and this is 3000% indisputable. 
*3000% mainstream ethnology, just like muh black hunter-gatherers
>what?
I meant Hitler didn't really genocide us unlike Stalin. Out 10 mln inhabitants of Belarus there was 1+ mln Jews. The Nazis killed kind of 800k civilians under their rule, and approximately 750k of them happened to be jewish.
>Not a whataboutism what are you even talking about? you can't engange with what i am trying to and so have to resort to literal muh fallacy midwit bullshit as expected
whatever you say
>Hitler and Himmler are closer in terms of ideology and thought with Varg Virkenes
Yeah racist christians and pagans are united in their racial identity but it's not an argument
>...then they are to your average christkike whatever branch of zogtianity they are
Because of gnostic universalism that's rooted in pagan philosophies which attracted christian leaders after the death of the Apostles for some reason (okay it was ignorance and the obsessed medcuck mindset)
>just mention when hitler praised christ 
In his autobiography, ofc. But he usually refers to the "Almighty Lord". Whatever, there's a William Fink's articles section on his site (Christogenea), which focuses directly on this:
>Historical Studies
>>Historical studies
>>>Modern History
>>>>Modern History
>>>>>Hitler and Christianity
>>>>>>Hitler and Christianity
>>>>>>Hitler, Christian, Part 1
>>>>>>Hitler, Christian, Part 2
<brapbant space 
>or said he hated pagans 
Pagans weren't a real demographic group back then, so he barely spoke about them. Especially in Mein Kampf. Cope with the fact paganism wasn't even real before, idk, 1990s? You got the idea.