Markup /brabant/10765

Comment
>>10762
Nothingwaffel
>>10763
>God allows animal suffering to happen in nature, without human intervention
Well, this is since they are inferior to humans (whites), wilderness and cruelty is their nature and blah blah blah it's so because it can't be anything else. The world is imperfect and only God is perfect. This is the origin of the original sin — Adam was created in the inage of God to be His son but he's not Him so he wasn't perfect enough not to fall.
>This is different from humans as they have sinned, animals on the other hand are not rational agents
Exactly! This is what I'm waffling about. Animals can't live another way! And nature can't be not like that! They are imperfect!
>He could've made a world where animals wouldn't need to be viciously maimed by eachother but chose to do the opposite
Why? Why He had to have make the world like this? In God there is fullness, and His gifts and grace against the background of the world's insufficiency acquire meaning. Or something like that. In any case, the food chain and its existence can't be an argument against God.
>>10764
Nee, wrong. Your point is literally "here's a black chinese, therefore, you aren't right!" or "here's a black norse pagan, therefore, you aren't right!".