No.11652
Tommyinnit won
No.11653
PinoyGOD above me
No.11657
Spic
No.11658
>>11657Wtf is this country u are from
No.11662
>Lied about being on a no-fly list
>Mysteriously had his assets unfrozen by the Feds
>Calls Peter Thiel a kike because Thiel refused to give him money
>Backstabbed everyone he’s worked with
>Lied about James Allsup
>Betrayed Ethan Ralph over a literal nothingburger
>Shilled for Laura Loomer
>Covered up Ali Alexander’s crimes harder than Trump covered Epstien
>Ali Alexander is still associated with AF (he runs AF Post on Xitter)
>When confronted by police about his ideology, he mysteriously becomes Mexican
>Fears Stephan Miller
did he win?
No.11665
>>11658You can just hover over the flag.
Guatemala
No.11668
I know him only as a lolcow, does he have any actual influence outside of his terminally online circle of followers?
No.11670
>>11663holy fuck i posted this on soy and got quints with it
A.F VVON
No.11671
>>11668hes not very influential and hes definitely not a serious politician but he has some very good takes and commentary
No.11673
I don't know anything about him, he always seemed like a cornball.
No.11678
>>11673He glows harder than a radioactive substance, also he shilled for Kamala and his entire movement is based upon integrating Browns into the Reddit Race, because those people hate the jews just like you and they're exactly as white as you are. He's also gay and most of his followers are 30+ years old 4pedos, there's very little to like about Fuentes if you're white, maybe the fact he makes noise in the political scene, but he shouldn't be idolized
No.11680
>>11678Oh yeah he got his dick sucked by Destiny, geg.
No.11681
>>11679What even are you? I pretty much can identify everyone on /brabant/ by race or ideology, but you're a blank. Guess you're Spic Fuentes guy now ofzo.
No.11682
>>11681im a white american with irish/english ancestry
No.11700
>>11696i used to be a redit tier athiest but im starting to read the bible right now not sure about which denomination i want to be doe
No.11701
>>11700Sadly you can't be racist if you're a Christian, but it gives good peace of mind. I know I might sound like a glownigger, but, what state/area (Midwest, East Coast, the South, West Coast etc) do you live in? Feel free to not answer.
No.11702
>>11701i wouldn't call myself a racist but because i dont wish any harm onto different ethnicities and i dont want them to leave the U.S.A i just want cities and states to be relatively racially homogenous and as for where i live its the east coast and the only reason i answered that is because i doubt the government has someone on payroll watching the Dutch cartoon website
No.11703
>>11702also in regard to me using slurs in this thread the only reason im saying them is because imageboard users like me tend not to care about being called them
No.11727
>>11701You can be both. If you're gonna argue this, you'll be banned on muh board.
No.11751
Nick Fuentes just BTFOed Tucker Carlson
https://rumble.com/v6x2fjg-exposing-tucker-carlson.html?e9s=src_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_sa_m%2Csrc_v1_ucp_v>heckin ip loggerino!i cant download rumble streams and its also 2 hours long im not downloading all that
No.11752
>>11727How can you be both?
No.11758
>>11752Christianity is an exclusive racist religion pushing for white supremacy
At least the text teachs that, and the Church used to be like that back then aha
No.11759
>>11758not really
some of the first adopters of Christianity were the Ethiopians and the middle easterners
While people are not equal on earth everyone is equal in the eyes of god and that transcends race
(btw im not the guy you were replying too)
No.11760
>>11759also women and the poor
No.11761
>>11758hallucinated it again award
>>11759trvthnuke. there are no races, only people struggling for virtue, which without God they cannot achieve.
It is easy to present a sort of "average morality" of a certain region, which is very true. But everyone sins in some regard, and we are all far away from God. Thus we must strive for goodness, rather than point out the difference between us, which is miniscule in comparison to absoluteness.
It is God who covers us in His goodness after all, no one can boast.
No.11762
>>11761Hoi JapARYAN I remember yuo from sharty /pol/
No.11763
>>11758God doesn't discriminate who he sends to hell. A white is just as able to commit a sin as much as a black, and thats all he cares about.
No.11764
>>11762oh yeah i remember him too
No.11765
>>11761i wouldn't go as far as there are no races but i think that we are all more similar than not and interracial violence both physical and emotional is not justified
No.11767
>>11762nah fake I'm not the guy I'm a VPNaryan
No.11768
>>11763Is a retard or a psychopath as able to commit a sin (and be responsible for it) as a normal person? Christianity seems to be at odds with biological reality.
No.11769
>>11767Oh, well he's a 'ligger aswell.
No.11770
>>11768Everyone has their own measure according to their capability
No.11771
>>11768Yes. We are in control of our actions, albeit retards cannot. Psychopaths are murders, and you choose murder. What does this hace to do with race now?
No.11772
>>11759>some of the first adopters of Christianity were the Ethiopians and the middle easterners As Christianity developed, Ethiopians, Copts, Armenians and others were excluded from le Church as heretics, which is notable. Concerning Ethiopians conversion: it happened accidentally, because Frumentius' ship was caught in a storm and he had no choice but to live where he was wrecked. And the first Christians weren't Middle Easterners, but Israelites. It's known that Christianity attracted not only whites, so even in the time of the Apostles they wrote letters in which they criticized these "beasts" in the "feasts of charity". These Apostles were killed too early, and therefore they were unable to do more than they could, and their disciples came in their place, teaching some pagan, helleno-roman paragnostic stuff based on their own understanding of the world and Christianity based on, again, pagan philosophies. This is why Church Fathers are so contradictory to each other, and aren't relevant as the ultimate source of truth about the Bible and the Path it preaches.
>While people are not equal on earth everyone is equal in the eyes of god and that transcends raceIt's universalism, lol!
>I'm not one you replied toGeg, baited.
>>11761I'm reminding the first 'p spammer I directly met on the Zarty in 2024 was a jap btw
Whatever I don't like you and I won't argue with you since that
>>11762Oh nononono… Shartycacas are all non-aryans…
>>11763>Sends to hellAfterlife is a trick of inscrupulous priests and aims at sowing fear among people.
>A white is just as able to commit a sin as much as a black, and thats all he cares aboutHe doesn't care about what do you do, the Salvation is unshakable and it is given by grace, not by what you did. But the reward that is coming in the Kingdom is that depends on the person. Let me remind you, Jesus died for your sins not because you love Him, but because He loves you. And His love is limited to your white Adamic race (or whatever you may call it).
>>11768Only if you're a confessionalcuck that believes Jesus was brown or whatever the modern priests preach about now ("we must send moneeeey to Isreal and be salvated by this or something yeah").
No.11774
>>11772>Hell isn't real lolTs nigga bro- You can't win with someone who thinks like this.
No.11775
>>11772No, oriental churches did a schism because they didn't accept the council of Chalcedon.
Also blvd will I make you feel better if change my VPN location geg
How prelested do you have to be to deny core concepts of the afterlife? And why do you complain about modern theology if all they do is improvise just like you? Pride is a dangerous trap that one may not even notice, this isn't funny to me btw, it's not good
<btw so I can do the worst evil I can think of and I'll still be saved WITHOUT repentance because God does not care at all? Blud…
No.11776
>>11774No you cannot, only God can. and our intercessions help too
No.11778
>>11777Sorry, but it was kinda a DNB thread…
No.11779
>>11777Geg it always boils down to this
But alright.
No.11780
>>11778Yes but most threads here are DNBs
No.11781
>>11780Someone make a religion thread so we can have 1488 pph o algo
No.11794
>>11775>No, oriental churches did a schism because they didn't accept the council of ChalcedonLiterally what I said, you radiated bug island japkike. Kys btw, you're non-white, Mymy won, and you will never be as germanic and white as she is.
>How prelested do you have to be to deny core concepts of the afterlifeI need to be able to rrad, at least. Bible never said there's afterlife or a conscious state of mind outside of the body after death. And if there's soul and afterlife, why did Christ resurrect? Cuckolix and orthomodox can't answer this geg.
>btw so I can do the worst evil I can think of and I'll still be saved WITHOUT repentance because God does not care at all? BludEveryone who's predestined to Salvation will repent in the end, after being improved in the likeness of Christ, remaining without sin, for Christ came to destroy the "Devil" (the sinful nature of the man) and "his works" (sin), as well as that through which it was revealed (the non-white "field beast" races). And yes, you can do whatever, but if you it's bad you'll be deprived of the reward and be the least in the Kingdom. Salvation isn't the reward itself, but you view it exactly like that. It's retarded.
>>11777Shut up, it's an euro site. We're the masters here, and you're the nigger bcs you're an amerimutt.
>>11781Nu/brapbant/cacas… why are ye like this
No.11804
>>11801please read the bible instead of getting your theological advice from chuds on /pol/
No.11805
>>11804I don't browse /pol/ but I would like to.
No.11807
>>11805you're browsing the zarty equivalent of /pol/ right now
No.11808
>>11807And who taught me the things I tell you? Zoot? Geg
No.11809
>>11808i don't know but clearly it wasn't a reliable source
No.11812
>>11809It was the most reliable source ever, right.
No.11817
>>11812Your ass doesn't count.
No.11819
>>11671takes usually stolen from Mike Enoch or Eric Striker
No.11820
>>11819Marge me in (not OP)
No.11837
>>11820doxxed/deplatformed national socialists. when Nick talks about jews he's usually saying something that The Daily Shoah or WarStrike said six months ago
No.11838
>>11837It's for all the rw xittertards who don't go any farther than xitter. He can steal stuff from lesser known places and none of the cacas who watch him would be the wiser.
No.12137
why do people call fuentes brown even though hes only like 25% mexican (not an ethnicity btw so his european mexican ancestry could heavily vary) hes more italian than mexican (50%) and has 25% irish ancestry he probally has like 15-5% beringian ancestry you can make fun of him for other reasons cmon
No.12138
>>12137although to peoples credit that one mugshot of him looks heavily beringian lol just in the phenotype. his mexican ancestor might be heavily beringian becuase it just shows through too much.
No.12139
>>12137/pol/ACKs think that anyone more left leaning than Hitler is a tranny-loving nigger with a cuck fetish. They will try to find any hint of non-European ancestry in anyone they disagree with too discredit their points (eve&oe most /pol/ users are browner than him GEG)
No.12143
>>12141southern italian closeness to ashkenazis is not from southern italians having ashkenazi ancestry it's from ashkenazis having 40-60% southern italian ancestry. im pretty sure theres a graph that proves that southern italians are still like, 30% middle eastern though. this also doesn't pull in the full picture becuase hes also 25% irish and 25% mexican.
No.12144
>>12143TSMT most people forget modern jews are Mega-Mutts in terms of how race-mixed they are
No.12145
>>12143im pretty sure if you took out all of the individual ancestries of each group (calabrian, mexican) and took out all of the non-white ancestry i think fuentes would be like 65% white white. i still don't like him though
No.12146
>>12145why dont you like him doe?
No.12147
>>12146hes a homosexual third worldist and he glows harder than the elephants foot.
No.12154
Sam Hyde just interviewed him on The Sam Hyde Show. No, I didn't watch it, and I am now unsubscribed to Sam Hyde, I can't take this Meximutt faggot seriously, he sounds too much like Ben Shapiro, and his takes are ridiculous.
No.12155
>>12154Why were you even subscribed in the first place if you're just going to unsubscribe over the smallest thing?
No.12156
>>12155Uhh i'm a clittycel. I guess I should just watch to see if it's really that bad.
No.12162
>>12142Put the basal west eurasian ancestral components it's not that hard
>>12143Ashkenazim are 60% levantine, southern shitalos are 50% levantine. Choose your shitskin, idiot.
>It's from ashkenazim having 40-60% Southern Shitalian ancestrySouthern Shitalos already were shitskin back then when the ashkenazim formed retard. That's to say between I and V centuries AD.
>>12144No you guys are just retards that's why you think I forgot this circumstance.
>>12145Wrongest nigger award. 75% of his ancestry isn't european, period.
No.12168
>>12162>Southern Shitalos already were shitskin back then when the ashkenazim formed retard. That's to say between I and V centuries AD.Yeah? southern shitalians are still 50-60% euro you can't deny that. im not saying they are white but they are significantly european with an obvious levantine aspect due to roman era muttification.
>Wrongest nigger award. 75% of his ancestry isn't european, period.biggest most retarded reductionist baboon award.
No.12170
>>12169i think it would be better if we just got to see his parents/grandparents unironically from his calabrian and mexican side. would clear a lot of things up if you ask me.
No.12171
Irish are the jews of the huwite race, it checks out
No.12173
>>12165>it's not about phenotypeGuess I could be white after all…
No.12174
>>12171irish are aryans lol
>>12173yes pheno actually doesn't matter a lot. spaniards are just swarthy due to skin pigmentation genes but are closer (and by a longshot) to germans genetically. in comparison, "white" looking georgians (from the country) aren't related to europeans at all and are their own thing but sometimes just have naturally lighter skin. you might have small amounts of turkish DNA if you are unlucky though. serbs im pretty sure are still like 90% white thoughie on average which is the same as spaniards.
No.12175
No spic nick is turbofedgriftercoal geeeg
No.12179
>>12177Sorry i didn't like how that post came out. what i was trying to say that an average does not mean everyone in a population. FOR EXAMPLE. white americans are on average, 95% white and 5% something la atrocidad not white. HOWEVER, the vast majority of white americans don't non-white ancestry and a minority has a small amount of it which shows up on the end result.
No.12180
>>12179im sourcing this from some random ancient ahh graph that i don't have downloaded but im sure that everyone here has seen so you'll just have to believe me
No.12182
>>12164He doesn’t act white
No.12183
>>12182This. to be honest being like 30-35% non white in my opinion at the very least is forgivable if you are of a high iq and don't have extreme amounts of subsaharan DNA (although middle eastern and beringian are forgivable since they are eurasians and sandnigs and natives already share SOME genetic ties to europeans, nogs aren't even related to even eurasians and their skull shapes honestly scare me out of how foreign they really are.)
this is the problem with a lot of near-europeans, they're like 75% something white but their iq is mediocre and dysgenic which is why nations like brazil and argentina failed but the iberian med system of goverment is honestly atrocious.
No.12184
>>12183Also fun fact 30% andronovo pakistanis are closer to northern europeans than 50% iberian mexicans. this is due to ones european ancestry population being naturally very much closer to modern northern europeans than the other. andronovo were basically swedes lel
No.12185
>>12168>southern shitalians are still 50-60% euro you can't deny thatTurks are ≈55% white if speaking strict. Most caucasians are ≈60% white. Ashkenazim and Mauritalians are ≈70% white. I'm not going to summarize all the non and white admixtures because he's mainly a mix of nons between themselves and only 25% irish. So basically only 25% properly white ancestry. I bet, even balkan turks would pass as white with a more probability than Nick. Lmao.
>>12169Mathcuck, his white european ancestry is leveled out by mexicans, so basically he's still moor-tier white.
>>12173Not gonna deny that but serbians are actually european but still too southern for me so I still haye 'em
>>12177Only one percent pass as white. Gegging so hard rn.
>>12179False. 94% Americans don't even have any non admixtures in them.
>>12183>IQ changes your raceHapa Mymy-Maya-fag pedo cult ITT, shut it down
>>12184>Andronovo pakistanisWhom the fuck are you implying
>Bronze age aryans I mean…
No.12186
>>12185>Turks are ≈55% white if speaking strictThat's very few turks lol. maybe the ones who live in the european continent part of the country.
>Ashkenazim and Mauritalians are ≈70% white.ashkenazism are not that white lol. italians might be true but ashkenazism are literally as white as southern italians like you said with sometimes a bit of germanic and slavic on them.
>Mathcuck, his white european ancestry is leveled out by mexicans, so basically he's still moor-tier white.Mexican isn't an ethnicity. we don't know if his parents were 1% criollos or literal natives.
>False. 94% Americans don't even have any non admixtures in them.true.
>>IQ changes your racei was not implying this, they are still white (depending on how you view it) they're just low iq and unreliable.
>Only one percent pass as white. Gegging so hard rn.cucking millions of latinx with 80% white ancestry
No.12187
>Whom the fuck are you implying
im anthropology babbling too hard here sorry
No.12188
heres my honest opinion on latinx whiteness
>20-50%
not even, europeans are literally closer to afghanis/tajiks/tatars than they are to this tier of euro ancestry latinx
>50-60%
euro-adjacent but not "aryan" or closely related to northern europeans in any way. connection to spanish/iberians is present but i wouldn't call these people white honestly lol
>60-75%
European and white but still not "aryan". even stronger conection to iberians but weak connection to northern europeans.
>75-85%
European, not sure about how aryan these people are but it depends on how much beringian or ssa they have
>85-100%
basically white european and aryan with the only exception being is that they have too much subsaharan like brazilians.
No.12189
>>12188this is excluding middle eastern and assuming you are purely iberian in your european so this isn't counting all of the white argentiniaGOD ethnics who have northern euro in them
No.12190
>>12186>That's very few turks lol. maybe the ones who live in the european continent part of the countryI'm referring to their principal components, not what you think.
>>Ashkenazism are not that white lol. italians might be true but ashkenazism are literally as white as southern italians like you said with sometimes a bit of germanic and slavic on them.>Ashkenazim Firstly, geg. Secondly, "Mauritalians" stood for the southern italians in that very sentence.
>Mexican isn't an ethnicity. we don't know if his parents were 1% criollos or literal nativesWhataboutism
>>i was not implying this, they are still white (depending on how you view it) they're just low iq and unreliable>if you're low IQ but white enough we still won't consider you white bcs low IQ is a nigger trait kek!Am I reading you right?
>80% white is enoughWhat about 80% white and 20% negro? Pushkin doesn't seem to be a very european example. So I don't think 20% non-europeoid isn't significant.
>>12187I know who are the Andronovo aryans. I can't comprehend the reason you called them pakistanis.
No.12191
>>12188Huge medications unto you
No.12192
>>12189>Whataboutismnot a whataboutism latinx aren't one uniform ethnic blob they aren't even a fucking race
>Firstly, geg. ok so 50% levantine ashkenazis are white-passing now? askhenazis are literally closer to palestinians than they are to germans.
>Am I reading you right?No they are still white. being dysgenic does not exclude you from a race in any way
No.12195
>I'm referring to their principal components, not what you think.
So you mean like the elite of turkey?
>What about 80% white and 20% negro? Pushkin doesn't seem to be a very european example. So I don't think 20% non-europeoid isn't significant.
20% negro would be an outlier in white latinxes. african ancestry is pretty rare in large amounts amd even amongst pardos and brazilian "negro" it's something like 30-50%. HOWEVER, you do have a point and there is a need to differentiate negro from beringian and middle eastern since the former is extremly genetically distant in comparison. it's mostly 0-4% in most latinx including their "white" substrate and i think it would be fair to denote anything above 6-14% african ancestry in whites as unfitting for the status of being officially european or white. although still euro-adjacent but obviously not put in with all of europeans. most "white" latinx also can get lumped into this.
No.12196
>>12195So yes, 20% non-europeoid is mostly fine or acceptable as long as there isn't too much subsaharan lumped in or it's purely just subsaharan. it would still genetically lump you close to europeans if it was something like 80% european 10% middle eastern 8% beringian 2% SSA just as an example.
No.12197
You can be european and white but still not aryan. there is a difference between euro-adjacent groups (WHG,ANF,EEF) and yamnaya and having little yamnaya or steppe ancestry makes you automatically non-aryan. i'd say anyone below 30% steppe can't be classified as aryan which even most greeks have
No.12198
>>12192>>Firstly, geg>So ashkenazim are white?No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.
>You're not reading me rightOk
>>12195>You meant the elite of Turkey?I meant the whole pop. "Principal" means "basal" or "basic". However, being ESL is aryan, fnf pedos on da shardee told me so!
>>12195Beringians? You mean North-Eastern Asians? I tend to equate them to negroes, since both are non-europeoid (europeoid = caucasoid in the broad meaning).
>>12195Let's just conclude that:
>more than 10% of +- pure mongols and negroes (and the corresponding ancestral pops) is illiquid >and that more than 20% of non-european (= non-white) europeoid components is illiquid as well>it would still genetically lump you close to europeans if it was something like 80% european 10% middle eastern 8% beringian 2% SSA just as an exampleYes but it's not what most of the latingos represent.
>>12197Why is the border 30%? Why not higher? Why not lower? And lol a lot of southern euros have lower than 30%, such as greeks, italians, spaniards, etc., I would even say the most of them.
No.12199
>>12197>No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.my bad
>I meant the whole pop. "Principal" means "basal" or "basic". However, being ESL is aryan, fnf pedos on da shardee told me so!ok
>Beringians? You mean North-Eastern Asians? I tend to equate them to negroes, since both are non-europeoid (europeoid = caucasoid in the broad meaning).Native americans. they're still eurasian and them and europeans share ancient north eurasian ancestry which doesn't make them in any way close to europeans however it is worth tossing them in a different group from negros since negros aren't even related to most of humanity and are completely different to our own. their skull shapes scream of this.
>Yes but it's not what most of the latingos represent.Yes we latingos arent white
>Why is the border 30%?includes most europeans except obviously for the groups you are mentioning which btw greeks and spaniards i think average around 30%. they can still be white and european but being aryan is exclusive sorry lol
>Why not lower?saar we 25% steppe white SAAAR BRAHMIN SAAAAR
No.12202
>>12199>Native Americans are still eurasianIdc about eurasians but west eurasians (europeans), Half-white-half-latino will be roughly grouped with MENA arabs.
>however it is worth tossing them in a different group from negrosI consider them to be one of the main "human" races, so I only put them into the group of the originally non-white main races (non-white europeoids are basically mulattos yuo know)
>since negros aren't even related to most of humanity Idc about the "global humanity"
>and are completely different to our own."Our"?
>their skull shapes scream of this.Also the skeleton, nervous system, muscles, and everything else too. Just like Asians.
>includes most europeans except obviously for the groups you are mentioning which btw greeks and spaniards i think average around 30%. they can still be white and european but being aryan is exclusive sorry lol I consider anyone with WHG+WSH=>50% a northerner and I think it is logical to connect "aryanness" with this "northernness", that's to say I equate the terms "aryan" and "north-european" sometimes, but really the most WSH peoples among whites are Celto-Germanics followed by other northerners like Balts, Slavs and Finns.
No.12205
I don't agree about making 80% euros non-white in all cases since it's not practical but you have completely beaten me here. good work.